How does one dimensional light warp multiple dimensions?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of light and its relationship with gravity and spacetime. Participants debate whether light is one-dimensional or three-dimensional, with some asserting that light, as an electromagnetic wave, is inherently three-dimensional. The conversation highlights that while mass warps spacetime, light, due to its energy and momentum, can also influence spacetime curvature. The complexities of quantum mechanics and general relativity are acknowledged, particularly regarding how light interacts with matter and its role in gravitational effects. Overall, the dialogue reflects a blend of curiosity and confusion about the fundamental properties of light and gravity.
Mazeikas
If light is one dimensional, yet has gravity, and gravity is the warpage of spacetime, and spacetime has four dimensions, then how does a one dimensional wave/particle warp multiple dimensions?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Hello Mazelkas, :welcome:

Being philosophical eh ? Interesting questions. Any references where you got this ?

Mazeikas said:
yet has gravity
It does not.
Mazeikas said:
gravity is the warpage of spacetime
It is not. The presence of mass warps spacetime. Light just follows the shortest path.
 
Mazeikas said:
If light is one dimensional

Light is not one dimensional. Electromagnetic waves, in both the quantum and classical theories, are three-dimensional disturbances in the EM field.

Mazeikas said:
yet has gravity

BvU said:
It does not.

My understanding was that light does indeed alter spacetime because of its energy, and thus does "have gravity".

Mazeikas said:
and gravity is the warpage of spacetime

BvU said:
It is not. The presence of mass warps spacetime. Light just follows the shortest path.

What do you mean, BvU? Isn't gravity exactly what Mazeikas said it was? The warpage of spacetime?
 
Thank you for the welcome. Are you certain light does not exert its own gravity? I am not saying you are incorrect, I just do not know. I thought I read that electromagnetic waves gave off gravity. Also, perhaps I am misunderstanding gravity. Is it not the warpage of spacetime?
 
Hello Drakkith! It is interesting we have received different perspectives regarding this, I thought a photon was one dimensional, I am not certain I am correct, but I think a lot of people believe this.
 
At what stage are you in your curriculum ? I'm worried you are even further out on a limb than I was with my experimentalist's reply. (To me, your wording suggested that).
 
BvU, I am actually just self taught right now, as far anything I may have correct, I am not sure. I am just full of curiosity and thought I would ask! :)
 
Mazeikas said:
Hello Drakkith! It is interesting we have received different perspectives regarding this, I thought a photon was one dimensional, I am not certain I am correct, but I think a lot of people believe this.

All fundamental particles are regarded as being "point-like", which naively is taken to mean that they are zero-dimensional. But a closer look into quantum mechanics muddies up the issue greatly. The particles are point-like in the sense that if you measure the location of a particle, it will always appear in one spot, no matter how small you constrain your area you're measuring. You will never measure half the particle in one spot and half in another, as you might do when you measure the location of a basketball. We can definitely say that a basketball is 3-dimensional because different parts of it are found in different locations in space. The same cannot be said of a fundamental particle.

However, we would then need to get into the issue of what the wavefunction is, what it means in regards to the dimensionality of a particle. There is no widely accepted answer to these questions as far as I know.
 
Drakkith, great thoughtful response, I appreciate that. You are informing me, and I think you raise a valid point. Could light exist in more than one dimension as a wave and in one dimension as a particle? With the direction of movement being one dimension, and the oscillation of the wave as another, is it reasonable to hypothesize that a wave exists in at least two dimensions? Just my two cents. :)
 
  • #10
Mazeikas said:
Could light exist in more than one dimension as a wave and in one dimension as a particle? With the direction of movement being one dimension, and the oscillation of the wave as another, is it reasonable to hypothesize that a wave exists in at least two dimensions?

An EM wave moves outwards from the source and is already moving in a 3D motion (meaning its motion can be described using the standard 3D Cartesian coordinate system). The oscillation of the wave is not a physical oscillation. Nothing is moving. Instead, the electric and magnetic field vectors (the things that describe the direction of the force applied to a particle by the wave) oscillate in direction and magnitude.

A photon is basically the quantized interaction of the EM wave with matter. Photons are not like little bullets streaming out from a source, nor are they individual oscillating objects. They are discrete transfers of energy and momentum from the wave to matter.

I'd elaborate a bit more, but it's nearly 4 AM here and I've been up for about 20 hours and am about to go to bed.
 
  • #11
Well perhaps you should get some sleep. :) Thank you for your input, you have given me something to think about. Take care!
 
  • #12
This discussion is a little bit difficult because it mixes photons from QED and GR, which is known to be problematic. I cannot answer that question, but I can talk about classical waves of light and GR.

The source of gravity in GR is the stress energy tensor, and since light has energy and momentum and so forth it has a valid non-zero stress energy tensor. Meaning that EM fields do curve spacetime.

There are a set of solutions in GR called the pp-wave spacetimes which represent the curvature due to EM radiation.
 
  • #13
Dale, thank you for your insight. :) Once again, I am learning more, and I am grateful for that. I have more to look into.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K