How does one make sure that one had understood the material studied?

  • Thread starter Thread starter arroy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Material
AI Thread Summary
Understanding advanced physics material requires more than just reading; it involves active engagement with the content. One effective method to assess comprehension is by solving a variety of problems beyond assigned ones, ensuring clarity on each solution step. Another strategy is to teach the material to someone else, which helps identify gaps in understanding. Creating original problems and solving them further solidifies knowledge. Additionally, applying concepts to real-world scenarios can enhance critical thinking and reveal areas needing further study. Engaging with the material in these ways fosters a deeper understanding and builds confidence in the subject matter.
arroy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I do not fully understand the process of understanding of a material one reads. Suppose someone reads a chapter from a physics book. How does one make sure that one has really understood what she/he had read? I must confess that at times I read from text and I even feel that I had understood the content but later (may be at the time of exams or solving assigments or when somebody raises a question from that topic), I realize that the feeling was illusory and I feel so stupid. At times I feel that my understanding is incomplete even at basic levels. I am eager to know from experienced people in this forum if there is any method to test whether one has really understood the content of what one had read. I am talking of advanced level physics courses. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
One way is to see if you can do the problems not just the ones assigned but the other ones as well and then know why each step of the solution was needed.

The other way is to see if you can teach it to someone even if only an imaginary student. There was a humorous book entitled "How to Teach Physics to Your Dog" whose title says it all.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/1416572295/?tag=pfamazon01-20

In either case, you will have identified the stumbling blocks and then you'll know what you'll need to study.
 
I second the comment- try and teach/explain it to someone else.
 
I think the first threshold is being able to solve problems as said already. The second is being able to explain how to solve those problems to someone else, as said already. The third is to be able make your own problems and then answer them. If you can do all three of those things, you've got it.
 
A great way to really understand the material is to resist the material. Justify any reasoning to yourself, work through derivations, etc.
 
Just to add another suggest, I found that having the confidence to use the knowledge you read to analysis real world events helps me solidify my understanding and find where I still where I still need to focus. For example, when I was learning statistics, I used to look at surveys or data and see if a person is purposefully giving a mean vs a median or what factors may cause bias in the responses etc. I would also try to see if a method was used incorrectly or too strong a conclusion was drawn. Doing this forced me think critically on theory and gain confidence in my understanding of the subject.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
102
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top