How does parity affect particle exchange in para- and ortho-hydrogen?

Rudipoo
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I'm struggling with the relation between particle exchange and parity with the case of para- and ortho-hydrogen.

The overall wavefunction must be antisymmetric with respect to particle exchange and so for para-hydrogen (an antisymmetric spin state) the spatial part of the wavefunction must be symmetric with respect to particle exchange.

My notes say that because the parity of a state of angular momentum quantum number l is (-1)^l then for para-hydrogen l may only take even values. I'm struggling to see the relationship between parity and particle exchange in this case, can anyone help?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If \vec{r} is the relative position of the two identical particles, then parity \vec{r} \rightarrow - \vec{r} is formally like particle exchange. Does that make sense? Thus in simple cases the parity of the wavefunction tells you about the symmetry or antisymmetry under particle exchange.

Try it in one dimension to get a feeling for things.

Hope this helps.
 
Yes that makes sense, thank you. If we had a system of say 3 protons the the overall angular momentum would not tell us about the symmetry with respect to particle exchange - is that correct?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top