How does pendulum height relate to length when impacted by a bullet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BryMan92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Height Length
AI Thread Summary
In a ballistic pendulum problem, the relationship between pendulum height and length is crucial for understanding motion after impact. A pendulum of length 5m cannot exceed its maximum height of 5m due to its physical constraints, despite a bullet causing it to reach a height of 14m. The kinetic energy imparted by the bullet will convert to potential energy at the peak height, but the pendulum's length limits its actual height. The discussion highlights confusion about calculating the height after impact, emphasizing that the pendulum's maximum height is determined by its length. Ultimately, the pendulum cannot rise higher than its length, regardless of the energy transferred by the bullet.
BryMan92
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Last year, I remember doing a ballistic pendulum problem, and this year I forgot how I did it. Essentially, what happens if you have a ballistic pendulum, of length 5m, and you shoot a bullet at it that cause it to go to a height of 14m? (What I mean is that the bullet causes the pendulum to rotate several times). So, after spinning around, how high will the pendulum go before momentarily stopping?


Homework Equations


MiVi=MfVf
KE=PE


The Attempt at a Solution


I figured you'd just subtract 10 (Since the max. height the pendulum can go is 10 m), and you'd get 4m? I'm drawing a blank.

Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
do u mean the bullet has an energy of mg*14 ?
 
The mass isn't important, I'm just curious what happens when height of the pendulum is confined by its length. So, if the length is 5, and the height (aka, when the kinetic energy = potential energy) is greater than 5. In this case, I made up 14.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top