How Does Pump Irradiance Affect Gain in a Four-Level Laser System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GreenPrint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gain Laser
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the pump irradiance necessary for a four-level laser system to achieve a small signal gain coefficient of 0.01/cm and the saturation irradiance. The user starts by applying the small-signal gain coefficient equation and the effective pump rate density equation to derive the formula for pump irradiance. They encounter difficulty in calculating the phase velocity, which is essential for solving the problem, but later realize they can express it in terms of energy levels. Ultimately, the user successfully solves the problem but questions the necessity of the given wavelengths in their calculations.
GreenPrint
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure if this question should be posted in the introductory physics section or the advanced physics section.

Consider an amplifying medium, composed of homogeneous broadening four-level atoms as show in figure 26.5, page 557 of textbook.

http://img689.imageshack.us/img689/6108/lt2f.png

Amplification is to occur on the 2-to-1 transition. The medium is pumped by a laser of intensity I_{p}, which is resonant with the 3-to-0 transition. The spontaneous decay processes are indicated on the diagram. The total number of gain atoms is N_{T} = N_{0} + N_{1} + N_{2} + N_{3}. The various parameters are:

k_{32} = 10^{8} \frac{1}{s}; k_{21} = 10^{3} \frac{1}{s}; k_{10} = 10^{8} \frac{1}{s}; k_{30} = k_{31} = k_{20} = 0
σ_{p} = 4x10^{-19} cm^{2}; σ = 2.5x10^{-18} cm^{2}; λ_{30} = 300 nm; λ_{21} = 600 nm; N_{τ} = 2.0x10^{26} m^{-3}

Assuming an ideal four-level laser system determine:

a) The pump irradiance required to sustain a small signal gain coefficient of \frac{0.01}{cm}
b) The saturation innradiance.

Homework Equations


===
The small-signal gain coefficient γ_{0} and the saturation irradiance I_{S} take the form

γ_{0} = σR_{p2}\tau_{2}

I_{S} = \frac{hv^{'}}{σ\tau_{2}}
===
R_{p2} is a effective pump rate density

R_{p2} = \frac{κ_{32}}{κ_{3}}(\frac{σ_{p}I_{p}}{hv_{p}}N_{T})
===
In a closed system

κ_{3} = κ_{32} + κ_{31} + κ_{30}
===
The lifetime \tau of an energy level is defined to be the inverse of the total decay rate from the level so that

\tau_{n} = \frac{1}{κ_{n}}, n \epsilon Z
===
Planck's constant h\ =\ 6.62606876(52)\ \times\ 10^{-34}\ J\ s
===
The phase velocity v_{p} of a wave can be expressed as

v_{p} = \frac{ω_{p}}{k_{p}} ≈ \frac{ω}{k}
===
k is the propagation constant of a wave that can be expressed as

k = \frac{2\pi}{λ}

Where λ is the wavelength
===
The angular frequency ω of a wave can be expressed as

ω = 2\pi f

Where f is the frequency
===
\pi ≈ 3.14
===

The Attempt at a Solution



I start off with the equation for the small-signal gain coefficient γ_{0}

γ_{0} = σR_{p2}\tau_{2} [1]

and plug in the equation for R_{p2} effective pump rate density

R_{p2} = \frac{κ_{32}}{κ_{3}}(\frac{σ_{p}I_{p}}{hv_{p}}N_{T}) [2]

into [1].

This yields

γ_{0} = σ\frac{κ_{32}}{κ_{3}}(\frac{σ_{p}I_{p}}{hv_{p}}N_{T})\tau_{2}

I solve this equation for the pump irradiance I_{p} and get

I_{p} = \frac{γ_{0}κ_{3}hv_{p}κ_{2}}{σκ_{32}σ_{p}N_{T}} [3]

I know that for a closed system

κ_{3} = κ_{32} + κ_{31} + κ_{30}

Looking at the given variables I get

κ_{3} = κ_{32} + 0 + 0 = κ_{32}

Substituting this into [3] yields

I_{p} = \frac{γ_{0}κ_{32}hv_{p}κ_{2}}{σκ_{32}σ_{p}N_{T}} [3]

Simplifying this yields

I_{p} = \frac{γ_{0}hv_{p}κ_{2}}{σσ_{p}N_{T}} [4]

At this point it looks like I'm very close to solving this problem as all but one variable the phase velocity v_{p} is given. As mentioned in the relevant equations

v_{p} = \frac{ω}{k}

This however doesn't really help me. So there must be some other way of expressing the phase velocity v_{p} that I'm not aware of. Once I figure this out I should be able to solve this problem easily. My book doesn't have any examples in this section and I can't seem to find similar questions on the internet, hence I'm stuck and not really sure how to proceed.

Thanks for any help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I have just read the caption of the figure and now realize that v_{p}≈\frac{E_{3} - E_{0}}{h}. The only problem now is that I don't know E_{3} or E_{0}. Looks like I might be able to solve this.

I was able to solve the problem. My only concern is that I didn't use the given wavelengths in the problem. Are they needed to solve the problem?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top