How does quantum computing work?

Vacrin
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
how is it that we are able to get atoms to work like bits? and what is their counting system? because simply counting in 1's and 0's doesn't seem to make so much sense when electrons can be doing any number of things when they are not being observed.

i recently watched this


but it didnt explain things as much as i would like it to.

such as having 2 "qubits" is equivalent to 4 bits. can anyone explain? thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I thought quantum computers did not use 0's and 1's?
 
@Flatland: see the links.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top