How does relative motion affect speed calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gec5741
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Train
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the question of how fast a person is moving if they are on a train traveling at 5 mph while walking towards the back at 2 mph. The consensus is that speed must be defined with respect to a reference point, typically the ground or track. If measuring speed relative to the track, the person's speed would be 3 mph (5 mph - 2 mph). However, if measuring relative to the train, the speed is indeed 2 mph. The conversation highlights the importance of context in understanding speed measurements.
gec5741
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
OK This maybe a dumb question but we have some debate on this question here at my work. No one here is a physics pro. :) Here's the question.

If a train is moving at 5mph and you are moving tward the back of the train at 2 mph. How fast are you going?

Now I think the answere is 2 mph do to the way it's worded. But how can you not count the speed in which the trian is going? If your on a train that is going 5 mph aren't you also going 5mph?

Thanks to anyone that can help explain this. :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A speed must always be with respect to something to have any meaning. One might assume that the train is moving 5mph with respect to the track. If you move towards the back of the train at 2mph with respect to the train, then to find your speed with respect to the track you would add the speeds like so: +5mph -2mph = +3mph. (Your speed with respect to the train is negative since you are moving towards the back.)
 
there all saying the answere is 2 mph. I agree with what you said! :)
 
gec5741 said:
there all saying the answere is 2 mph. I agree with what you said! :)

Well, if your velocity is measured with respect to the train, then your speed would be 2mph.
 
gec5741 said:
there all saying the answere is 2 mph. I agree with what you said! :)
As long as you realize that "your speed" only has a meaning if you specify what you are measuring against. On a naive verbal level, the problem did say "you are moving at 2mph"-- but that's meaningless by itself. Your speed is also 0mph, 1mph, 3mph or almost anything else--depending on what you are measuring with respect to.
 
So this is what people do at work...
I wish my gas station cashier work were as challenging..
 
Doc Al said:
As long as you realize that "your speed" only has a meaning if you specify what you are measuring against. On a naive verbal level, the problem did say "you are moving at 2mph"-- but that's meaningless by itself. Your speed is also 0mph, 1mph, 3mph or almost anything else--depending on what you are measuring with respect to.

there could be a bird flying by the train at 10 mph and say hey that guys only moving at 7 mph

all of it depends on what you are using as a reference for the speed. ask yourself, it is going that many miles per hour... but (blank) miles per hour past what? the inside of the train? train tracks? neptune? what are you comparing it to
 
gec5741 said:
If a train is moving at 5mph and you are moving tward the back of the train at 2 mph. How fast are you going?

About 66,660 mph, of course! :biggrin:

(with respect to the sun, that is...)

(I say "about" because the exact value depends on the time of day, the train's latitude, and which direction it's traveling.)
 
If i were a photon, you wouldn't be moving at all
 
  • #10
jtbell said:
About 66,660 mph, of course! :biggrin:

(with respect to the sun, that is...)

I prefer to reference the centre of our local galactic cluster, in which case we're moving really damned fast.

Ki Man said:
If i were a photon, you wouldn't be moving at all

Not to imply that you're overweight, but that would be one hell of a diet plan.
 
Back
Top