How Does Rotational Velocity Affect Gravity and Space Launches?

AI Thread Summary
Rotational velocity significantly influences the effective gravity experienced on a planet's surface, as it combines with gravitational force and centripetal force. If Earth rotated much faster, objects on its surface could feel weightless due to increased centrifugal force. A planet with greater mass could achieve the same effective gravity with a larger radius or higher rotational velocity. However, launching objects into space still requires considerable energy, as the gravitational and centrifugal forces must be balanced. The effects of rotation vary by latitude, with centrifugal force being strongest at the equator and diminishing towards the poles.
Taremos
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I was thinking, the amount of "gravity" a person feels on the surface of a planet is not only dependent on gravity, but also the centripetal force...

For example, if Earth spun 17.04 times as fast as it does now (i.e. 1 day = 1.4 hours) then anything on the surface of the Earth would essentially be orbiting it, and would feel weightless!

Also, a planet with much more mass than Earth could have the same effective gravity at the surface if it had a larger radius or rotational velocity.

The only thing that's a little fuzzy to me is the effects this would have on actually launching things into space. A planet with higher mass and velocity with the same effective gravity on the surface would still make require much more energy to launch a mass into space, right?

Discuss.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Taremos said:
A planet with higher mass and velocity with the same effective gravity on the surface would still make require much more energy to launch a mass into space, right?
No. If the force ##F_{gravitational} - F_{centrifugal}## is the same on both planets (at some particular latitudes), than you need the same amount of energy.

Note: in this context I assume that "launching a mass into space" means just to leave the surface for a short instant (to consider a stable orbit or escaping the gravitational field entirely, we would need to work with particular values, including the size of the planet). Next, I also assume that the planet is perfectly spherical and homogeneous, so the (true) gravitational acceleration is the same everywhere on the surface (we are ignoring any effects of the rotation on the structure and shape of the planet).

Taremos said:
For example, if Earth spun 17.04 times as fast as it does now (i.e. 1 day = 1.4 hours) then anything on the surface of the Earth would essentially be orbiting it, and would feel weightless!
Only at the equator (the centrifugal force depends on latitude). As you move further toward any of the pole, the centrifugal effect would diminish and the resulting force would pull objects toward the surface. On the poles, the rotation of the planet doesn't provide any centrifugal force to counteract the gravity.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top