How Does Ruler Length Affect Spring Constant and Oscillation Frequency?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between the length of a ruler and its spring constant when oscillating with a mass at the end. It highlights the formula for deflection in a cantilever beam and connects it to Hooke's Law to derive the spring constant. The conversation also touches on the importance of torque and bending moments in this context. Additionally, the impact of changing the ruler's length on its natural frequency and the resulting pitch of the sound produced during oscillation is noted. Overall, the interplay between length, spring constant, and oscillation frequency is central to understanding the ruler's behavior.
Oblivionator
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
When oscillating a ruler with an extended mass on the end, what is the direct relation of the

length against the spring constant of the ruler? I heard the spring constant had some

relation with the curve of the ruler as it oscillates
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My take on this:

Deflection at the end of a cantilever beam of length L, elastic modulus E, second moment about neutral axis I, load at end (mass x g) F:

x = FL3 / 3EI

Using Hooke's Law: F = kx

Therefore k = 3EI / L3
 
don't you also have to take into account torque?

T = R x F
 
You're thinking of bending moment (analogous to torque, but preferred when you're talking about beams). The maximum bending moment for the beam that we're considering is the load at the end multiplied by the length: M = FL

However, the OP is talking about oscillating the system. I'm guessing they're wondering about changing the natural frequency of the ruler by changing the length that is free (how far over the edge of thet able it is before you 'twang' it). The change in natural frequency results in a change in the pitch of the sound you hear.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top