How Does Runtime Affect the Kolmogorov Complexity of a SAT Solver's Output?

sid_galt
Messages
502
Reaction score
1
I'm not entirely clear on the concept of kolmogorov complexity. Does it mean that the a certain string is complex if there is no combinatorial (not sequential) circuit which outputs that string or does it mean that a certain string is complex if there is no program which can output that string.

For instance, it is relatively easy to encode a SAT solver (for instance the DPLL algorithm). What would the kolmogorov complexity of the output string of this solver. Would it be extremely high because the solver requires exponential runtime or would it be low because the program to encode the solver is pretty small?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
sid_galt said:
For instance, it is relatively easy to encode a SAT solver (for instance the DPLL algorithm). What would the kolmogorov complexity of the output string of this solver. Would it be extremely high because the solver requires exponential runtime or would it be low because the program to encode the solver is pretty small?

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string is no more than the size of a program that generates it (along with the input, if any, needed by the program). Runtime is irrelevant.

The complexity could be less if there is a shorter program that generates the string.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top