How Does Snow Impact Paratrooper Survival Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gschwarz
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A paratrooper fell 380 m and landed in a snowbank, creating a 1.4 m deep crater, yet survived with minor injuries. The discussion revolves around estimating the work done by the snow to stop him, the average force exerted by the snow, and the work done by air resistance during his fall. The initial calculations for kinetic and gravitational potential energy were attempted but resulted in an incorrect value. The key to solving the problem lies in understanding the energy deficit due to the snow's impact and calculating average force using acceleration derived from speed changes. Clarification on these calculations and the physics principles involved is sought to resolve the issues.
gschwarz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Ive been trying to figure this out and i keep getting stuck.

A paratrooper pilot fell 380 m after jumping without his parachute opening. He landed in a snowbank, creating a crater 1.4 m deep, but survived with only minor injuries. Assume the pilot's mass was 76 kg and his terminal velocity was 50 m/s.

(a) Estimate the work done by the snow in bringing him to the rest.

(b) Estimate the average force exerted on him by the snow to stop him.

(c) Estimate the work done on him by the air resistance as he fell.


For part a i tried setting KE+GPE=W

so .5*76*50^2+76*9.8*380=W

I got 378024 J and it was incorrect. I don't know if some of my units are wrong or if my steps for solving part a are wrong.

Any help regarding parts b and c would be appreciated too.






The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
In vacuum, you know what his KE at the point of hitting the ground should be. But it's less. Where's the deficit?

His KE + PE just before hitting the ground is known. In absence of snow, it should be same at any point. Again, how much is the deficit?

F_av = ma. If initial and final speeds are known, then a can be found, and thus F_av.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top