How Does T Satisfy the Heat Equation?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the heat equation and the function T(x,t) defined as T(x,t)=T_{0}+T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\sin(\omega t-\lambda x), where ω and λ are constants. The original poster is tasked with showing that T satisfies the heat equation T_{t}=kT_{xx} and determining λ in terms of ω and k.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find the first and second order partial derivatives of T with respect to x and t, expressing confusion over the calculations and the relationship between the derivatives. Some participants question the correctness of the derivative calculations and suggest corrections to the original poster's approach.

Discussion Status

The discussion has progressed with participants providing feedback on the derivative calculations. The original poster has made improvements but still expresses uncertainty about the results. There is an acknowledgment that the relationship between the derivatives can lead to a definition of λ in terms of ω and k, though explicit consensus on the correctness of the approach is not established.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the complexities of partial derivatives and the implications of the heat equation. There is a focus on ensuring the mathematical expressions align correctly with the definitions provided in the homework statement.

mrcleanhands

Homework Statement


Where T(x,t)=T_{0}+T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\sin(\omega t-\lambda x)

\omega = \frac{\Pi}{365} and \lambda is a positive constant.

Show that T satisfies T_{t}=kT_{xx} and determine \lambda in terms of \omega and k.

I'm not to sure what is meant by the latter part of "determine \lambda in terms of \omega and k."

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



So I think I first have to find the partial derivatives of the first order.
\frac{\partial T}{\partial x}=-\lambda T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\sin(\omega t-\lambda x)+T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}(-\lambda)\cos(\omega t-\lambda x)

\frac{\partial T}{\partial t}=T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}(\omega t)\cos(\omega t-\lambda x)I then work out the second order partial derivative with respect to x and here it gets kind of messy and where I get confused.
<br /> T_{xx}=-\lambda^{2}T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\sin(\omega t-\lambda x)+T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}(-\lambda)\cos(\omega t-\lambda x)+(-\lambda^{2})T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\cos(\omega t-\lambda x)+-\lambda^{2}T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\sin(\omega t-\lambda x)

<br /> T_{xx}=-\lambda^{2}T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\sin(\omega t-\lambda x)-\lambda^{2}T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\sin(\omega t-\lambda x)-T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\lambda\cos(\omega t-\lambda x)-\lambda^{2}T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\cos(\omega t-\lambda x)

T_{xx}=-2\lambda^{2}T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\sin(\omega t-\lambda x)-\lambda T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\cos(\omega t-\lambda x)(1-\lambda)

T_{xx}=\lambda T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}(-2\lambda\sin(\omega t-\lambda x)-\cos(\omega t-\lambda x)(1-\lambda)<br />


This looks nothing like the partial derivative of the first order with respect to t...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're just not doing the partial derivatives correctly. For example, when you take the partial derivative with respect to t, the multiplier should be ω, not (ωt). Also, in Txx, each term should be multiplied by λ^2. You missed a factor of λ in the second term. Also, don't forget that (-λ)^2 is equal to λ^2, not -λ^2.
 
Ok I've improved it a little but still stuck...

T_{xx}=\lambda^{2}T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\sin(\omega t-\lambda x)+\lambda^{2}T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\cos(\omega t-\lambda x)+(\lambda^{2})T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\cos(\omega t-\lambda x)-\lambda^{2}T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\sin(\omega t-\lambda x)

T_{xx}=\lambda^{2}T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\sin(\omega t-\lambda x)-\lambda^{2}T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\sin(\omega t-\lambda x)+\lambda^{2}T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\cos(\omega t-\lambda x)+(\lambda^{2})T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\cos(\omega t-\lambda x)

T_{xx}=\lambda^{2}T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\cos(\omega t-\lambda x)+(\lambda^{2})T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\cos(\omega t-\lambda x)=2\lambda^{2}T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\cos(\omega t-\lambda x)


However, this still doesn't look right to me?

Because if T_{t}=kT_{xx}

then

\frac{\partial T}{\partial t}=T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\omega\cos(\omega t-\lambda x)=kT_{xx}=k(2\lambda^{2})T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\cos(\omega t-\lambda x) which isn't true
 
It is true for certain values of lambda. This basically gives you an equation which defines λ in terms of ω and k, which is what you were asked to provide.
 
Ok I see, so it goes like this:

Since\lambda
is a positive constant =kT_{xx}=k(2\lambda^{2})T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\cos(\omega t-\lambda x)
and \frac{\partial T}{\partial t}=\omega T_{1}e^{-\lambda x}\cos(\omega t-\lambda x)

For \frac{\partial T}{\partial t}=kT_{xx} to be true k(2\lambda^{2})=\omega therefore \lambda=\sqrt{\frac{\omega}{2k}}Then T_{t}=kT_{xx}
only when \lambda=\sqrt{\frac{\omega}{2k}}
 
You got it!
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K