How Does Temperature Affect Physical States and Processes?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on how temperature impacts physical states and processes, particularly in relation to homework questions. Key points include that crushed ice cools contents more effectively due to its larger surface area, and that a volume of air at 0 degrees Celsius remains at that temperature even when doubled in heat. It is noted that a glass of ice water and plain ice-cold water warm up at the same rate, and water boils at a lower temperature in the mountains compared to sea level. Additionally, compressing air increases its temperature, and an object radiating more energy than it absorbs will experience decreases in both temperature and thermal energy. The final question regarding the sun's energy radiation remains unclear, with participants expressing confusion about the correct answer.
cookies
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I need help with homework .. here's the question please correct me if i am rong

Ice is put in a cooler in order to cool the contents. To speed up the cooling process, the ice can be
A. Wrapped in newspaper
B. Kept out of contact with the food
C. crushed.
D. Drained of Ie water periodicly.
ANSWER: C. crushed. <-- pretty sure Crushed will have a larger surface area, therefore a larger area that can be cooled at once


A volume of air has a temperature of 0degrees Celsius. An equal volume of air that is twice as hot has a temperature of
A. 100degree Celsius
B. 0degree Celsius
C. 2degree Celsius * i think its this one not sure*
D. 273degree Celsius
ANSWER: B. 0degree Celsius, I thought of this as a math problem because of the key word "is" which means multiply .. so 0 times 2=0

Compared to a glass of ice water with ice in it, a glass of plain ice-cold water without ice on a warm day will warm up
A. Faster * i think its this 1 not 100% sure*
B. Slower
C. In the same amount of time.
ANSWER: C I think its in the same amount of time because even though both are not the same, they still warm up in the same rate.

In the mountains, water boils at
A. a lower temperature than at sea level
B. Higher temperature than at sea level
C. Same temperature as at sea level
ANSWER: A Since the mountain is really high it takes a lower temperature? that's just a guess i am not sure.

When a volume if air is compresed, its temperature
A. Increase * I am like 90% sure*
B. Decrease
C. Neither


When a volume of air is compresed, its temperature
A. Increase
B. Decrease
C. Neither
ANSWER: A When volume increase temperature decrease but when volume is compressed temperature is increease? i think that's how it works


If an object radiates more energy than it absorbs, it's
A. temperature decreases
B. Thermal energy decreases
C. Both of these
ANSWER: C I think when anything radiates more energy than it absorbs, it has something to do with both temperature decrease and thermal energy decrease



The reason the sun's radiate energy is of shorter wave lenths than the Earth's is because the sun
A. Has a higher temperature than Earth
B. Has much more thermal energy
C. is an energy source while the Earth is primily an energy reciever
ANSWER: i am clueless rite here please help :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
for the last one i believe it is C that the Earth is a reciver and the sun is a maker, for the first one i think that is also correct since it makes perfect sense, #2... wait what are you asking us? Since you have the answers already? are you looking for an explanation?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top