How does the discriminant work (quadratics)

  • Thread starter Thread starter autodidude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
The discriminant of a quadratic equation indicates the nature of its roots: two real roots if greater than zero, one real root if equal to zero, and no real roots if less than zero. It can be utilized to find unknown coefficients by establishing conditions for the number of real roots. This approach often involves determining the range of parameters that yield specific outcomes, such as positivity or definiteness of the quadratic. Completing the square can show how solutions relate to the discriminant, making it a practical tool in various mathematical applications. Understanding these concepts helps clarify why the discriminant is effective in solving quadratic equations.
autodidude
Messages
332
Reaction score
0
I remember back when I did a lot of quadratic equations, occasionally I had to find an unknown coefficient and if I remember correctly, generally I had to use the discriminant which gave me another quadratic which I could then use to solve for the coefficient.

My question is why does this work? Why can the discriminant be used in this way?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hey autodidude.

The discriminant in a quadratic well tell you whether the quadratic has two real roots (discriminant > 0), one real root (discriminant = 0) or no real roots (two complex roots with discriminant < 0).

The discriminant is a nice way to show the above and in certain applications, the nature of the above affects results that build on the result of solving these including things in calculus like solving linear ordinary differential equations.

Basically you can show by completing the square that the solution can be found in terms of the discriminant, but the discriminant is usually just an explicit expression that can be evaluated with a set of given constants. This is the core of why the quadratic equation works.

I get a feeling though you are not talking about an ordinary quadratic in the "special occasions". Maybe you could outline the sort of problem you are referring to if the above is not the case?
 
I think the OP is referring to questions involving determining the range of a parameter in one more more of the coefficients that result in a particular outcome for the number of real roots.

Something for example like: Find the range of parameter "k" such that the quadratic, x^2 + (2-k)x + 4, is positive definite.

Is that the type of problem you were thinking of autodidude?
 
Last edited:
Ohh ok.

Well in that case it's just adding an extra constraint which means you find that constraint to find your original problem.

Think of it like a tree where the leaves of the tree are all the conditions that you have and you work all the way back to the root to get a final solution.

It's more or less just a means to an end.
 
uart said:
I think the OP is referring to questions involving determining the range of a parameter in one more more of the coefficients that result in a particular outcome for the number of real roots.

Something for example like: Find the range of parameter "k" such that the quadratic, x^2 + (2-k)x + 4, is positive definite.

Is that the type of problem you were thinking of autodidude?

Yep, thanks for posting that!

@chiro: Thanks...that makes sense. I think I was expecting some deeper mathematical result lol
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top