How does the equation-of-state depend on the Quintessence potential?

AI Thread Summary
Quintessence fields roll down a potential V(φ), and while adding constants to this potential does not alter the equation of motion, it affects pressure, energy density, and the equation of state. A sufficiently large positive constant can make the equation of state w approach -1, raising questions about the invariance of physics in this scenario. The potential represents an energy density quantity that cannot be redefined by simply adding a constant, as it has a significant effect on spacetime curvature. This discussion highlights the complexities of how modifications to the potential influence fundamental properties in cosmology. Understanding these implications is crucial for advancing theories related to dark energy and cosmic expansion.
Amanheis
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Quintessence fields are supposed to slowly roll down a potential V(\phi). Adding constants to the potential obviously does not change the equation of motion for this field, but it does change the pressure, energy density and equation-of-state. In particular, if I choose a sufficiently large positive consant, the equation of state
w = \frac{\dot \phi^2/2 - V(\phi)}{\dot \phi^2/2+V(\phi)}
becomes eventually indistinguishable from -1.

Shouldn't physics stay invariant in this case?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Amanheis said:
Quintessence fields are supposed to slowly roll down a potential V(\phi). Adding constants to the potential obviously does not change the equation of motion for this field, but it does change the pressure, energy density and equation-of-state. In particular, if I choose a sufficiently large positive consant, the equation of state
w = \frac{\dot \phi^2/2 - V(\phi)}{\dot \phi^2/2+V(\phi)}
becomes eventually indistinguishable from -1.

Shouldn't physics stay invariant in this case?

yes,this potential is some quantily of energy density deimension and have absolute value to curve the space time.You can't redifine it by adding a constant. It is an extensive quantity right over there.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top