How Does the Inverse Square Law Apply to Force of Attraction Between Charges?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter esvion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Attraction Force
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the inverse square law to the force of attraction between electric charges, specifically in the context of Coulomb's law. Participants explore the mathematical formulation and implications of distance in the force equation, as well as comparisons to other physical principles.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the formula for the force of attraction between two charges and questions the rationale behind the inverse square of the distance in the equation.
  • Another participant identifies Coulomb's law as an example of an inverse square law, suggesting that this is a common principle in physics.
  • A later reply discusses the application of the inverse square law to point or spherical sources, contrasting it with cases involving infinite lines or planes where the force behaves differently.
  • One participant introduces the concept of multipoles and suggests that exploring far field proportionalities in such systems can lead to interesting insights.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the implications of the inverse square law, as there are multiple perspectives on its application in different geometries and contexts.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to specific cases where the inverse square law does not apply, such as infinite lines and planes, indicating that the applicability of the law may depend on the configuration of the charges involved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying electrostatics, physics students exploring the principles of forces between charges, and individuals curious about the mathematical relationships in physical laws.

esvion
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
The force of attraction formula between two charges is

[tex]\frac{(k)(e1)(e2)}{r^2}[/tex]

How does the inverse of r2 fit into the equation? I understand the concept of how distance would need to be the inverse in the function, but why is the distance (r) in the inverse squared? Is this the same principle of why s^-2 is the acceleration formula and time is square in the inverse?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Coulomb's law is an example of an inverse square law, something quite common in physics. Read about it here: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/Forces/isq.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I see! thanks!
 
Doc Al said:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/Forces/isq.html"
Note that inverse square law is applies to point or spherical sources. For an infinitely (or very large) long line or cylinder, the ratio of force versus perpendicular distance to the line is 1/r. For an infinitely (or very large) plane, the force is constant (independent of distance).

Found the link for the other cases at the same site: electrical field

For the infinite line case, the field strenth is a function of charge "density" over the perpendicular distance "z" to the line ( ... / z).

For the infinite disc (plane) case, the limit as "R" approaches infinity, the [1 - z/sqrt(z^2 + R^2) ] term approaches [1 - 0], and the field strength is constant, independent of distance
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Things get really cool when you start checking out far field proportionalities in systems of multipoles!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K