How Does the Quantum Operator \(\hat{p}^2\) Derive from \(\hat{p}\)?

N00813
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given that [itex]\hat{p} = -i\hbar (\frac{\partial}{\partial r} + \frac{1}{r})[/itex], show that [itex]\hat{p}^2 = -\frac{\hbar^2}{r^2} \frac{\partial}{\partial r}(r^2 \frac{\partial}{\partial r})[/itex]

Homework Equations



Above

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried [itex]\hat{p}\hat{p} = -\hbar^2((\frac{\partial}{\partial r})^2 + \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial}{\partial r} + \frac{\partial}{\partial r}\frac{1}{r} +\frac{1}{r^2})[/itex].

This gave me [itex]-\hbar^2((\frac{\partial}{\partial r})^2 + \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial}{\partial r} )[/itex] instead of the 2 / r factor I needed.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Nope. ##{\partial \over \partial r}{1\over r} ## gives ##{1\over r}{\partial \over \partial r} -{1\over r^2}##
Remember p is an operator: you have to imagine there is something to the right of it to operate on.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
BvU said:
Nope. ##{\partial \over \partial r}{1\over r} ## gives ##{1\over r}{\partial \over \partial r} -{1\over r^2}##
Remember p is an operator: you have to imagine there is something to the right of it to operate on.

Thanks!

I suppose it makes it easier if I had used a test function, and then taken it away.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
933