How Does the Square-Cube Law Limit Animal Size?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the square-cube law, which explains the limitations on animal size due to the relationship between height, strength, and mass. As an animal increases in height by a factor of ten, its strength increases by a factor of 100, while its mass increases by a factor of 1000. This discrepancy arises because strength is proportional to the cross-sectional area of muscles, not their total volume. The professor highlights that bones would struggle to support excessively large animals due to these physical constraints. Ultimately, this law illustrates why there are limits to how large animals can grow.
lnsanity
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I saw a MIT course on YouTube where the well know professor say that if I augment the height per 10 the strength augment by 100 (square) but the mass by 1000 (cube) so an animal would be 10 time relatively weaker if 10 time taller so he explain there is a limit to animal size because of this. He also said that the bone would not be able to support an animal too big.

My question is why the animal is only 100 time stronger not 1000 time ? since is muscular mass is 1000x ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lnsanity said:
My question is why the animal is only 100 time stronger not 1000 time ? since is muscular mass is 1000x ?
The strength would be (roughly) proportional to the cross-section of the muscles, not their total volume.

This principle is sometimes called the square-cube law.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
20K
Replies
18
Views
25K
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top