How does the sun burn without oxygen?

AI Thread Summary
The sun burns through nuclear fusion, not combustion, which requires oxygen. In the sun's core, intense heat and pressure enable hydrogen nuclei to fuse into helium, generating energy. While the term "burn" is used colloquially, it does not imply the presence of oxygen as in fire on Earth. Oxygen can be produced during stellar fusion processes and acts as a catalyst in further reactions, but it is not needed for the sun's primary energy production. Only extremely massive stars can fuse oxygen, requiring temperatures exceeding a billion degrees.
Anna Blanksch
Gold Member
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
On Earth, fire needs oxygen. If space has no oxygen, how does the sun continue to burn? Thanks! :) Ω
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
All stars burn due to nuclear fusion. Intense pressure creates intense heat. This heat and pressure drives the reaction.
 
Used here, the word "burn" is colloquial, not scientific.
 
The cool thing is that the sun doesn't really "burn" like fire does!

You're right that fires require oxygen as a reactant, but the sun runs on nuclear fusion. Nuclear fusion is the joining of atomic nuclei together and it's possible because of the high temperature and pressure in the sun's core. In the core, hydrogen nuclei fuse with other hydrogen nuclei to form helium (and this can happen with heavier and heavier nuclei with even more pressure and temperature) and photons, basically.
 
Additionally, one of the products of stellar fusion processes is oxygen, which is then used as an intermediate(catalyst) in further production of helium nuclei(wiki: the CNO cycle).
So if one is so inclined as to call fusion "burning", then we have to admit that oxygen IS used in at least some "burning" in stars.
 
Only extremely massive stars can fuse oxygen. It requires a core temperature over a billion degrees. A star this massive is called a type II supernova progenitor.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top