How Does the Trapezium Rule Apply to Unequal Widths in Integration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rock.freak667
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying the trapezium rule to integrate the function e^{-x} over the interval from 0 to 1 using two trapezia of unequal widths. The user initially struggles with the correct formulation of the trapezium rule and attempts to derive the expression for the approximation. A diagram of the exponential curve is suggested to visualize the trapezoids and their areas, which helps clarify the problem. The user realizes they made an error in their diagram by incorrectly marking the x-coordinates. Ultimately, the correct approach involves properly identifying the bases of the trapezoids along the x-axis.
rock.freak667
Homework Helper
Messages
6,221
Reaction score
31
[SOLVED] Help me with the trapezium rule please

Homework Statement


\int _{0} ^{1} e^{-x} dx
By using two trapezia of unequal width, with one width,h, and the other (1-h) show that
T\approx<br /> \frac{1}{2}(e^{-1}+h(1-e^{-1})+e^{-h}

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



So the sum is given by

\frac{1}{2}(e^h+1)h + \frac{1}{2}(e^{1-h}+e^h)(1-h)

= \frac{1}{2}(h+e^{1-h}+e^h-he^{1-h})

and here is where I can't show it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There may be a problem because this line should be

\frac{1}{2}(e^{-h}+1)h + \frac{1}{2}(e^{-h}+e^{-1})(1-h)

Draw a diagram of the exponential curve e^(-x), mark the points on the curve at x = h and x = 1, connect the dots from (0,1) to (h, e^(-h)) and from there to (1, e^(-1)), draw the trapezoids, and find their areas. (What the problem is calling the "widths" are the bases of the trapezoids along the x-axis.)
 
Last edited:
ahhhh...dumb me... I drew the diagram correctly but instead of from 0 to 1, I drew from 0 to -1...and I used the wrong x-coordinate...I got it now thanks!
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top