How Does the Upper Bound of f^{n+1}(x) Relate to 2^{n + 1} * n! on [-1/2, 1/2]?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Punkyc7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bound Upper bound
Punkyc7
Messages
415
Reaction score
0
Let f = ln(\frac{1}{1-x})


show that if x \in [-1/2 , 1/2] then


|f^{n+1}(x)| <= 2^{n + 1} * n!



I am having a hard time seeing how 2^{n + 1} * n! comes into play.


I have that the taylor series for f is \Sigma \frac{x^n}{n}


If a take a derivative it becomes x^(n-1) and if I plug anything on the interval it is less than one. I am thinking that I did this wrong because of how big that upper bound is/.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're currently using ##n## for two different purposes: the order of the derivative and the index of the sum. I strongly suggest using a different letter for one of these. For example, ##f(x) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} x^k/k##. And you want to show that ##|f^{(n+1)}(x)| \leq 2^{n+1}n!##. (I assume your exponent ##n+1## means the ##n+1##'st derivative.)

Try starting with ##n=0##. Can you show that the inequality is true in that case?
 
No one said you have to use the Taylor's series. Why don't you take 2 or 3 of derivatives directly and see if a pattern emerges. That could lead you to a proof by induction.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top