How Does the Y-Intercept Help Calculate Resistivity in an L/R vs. L Graph?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deliria
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistivity Weird
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between L/R and L in calculating resistivity (P) from a graph. The equation L/R = kl + A/P indicates that the y-intercept (9) represents A/P when L is zero. This means A can be determined as 9P, but without knowing the slope (k), resistivity cannot be uniquely identified. The calculated area (A) of 6.1 x 10⁻⁸ m² does not resolve the ambiguity between resistivity and area. Thus, while the intercept provides useful information, it does not allow for a definitive calculation of resistivity without additional data.
Deliria
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
This is a suggested relationship between L/R and L

L/R = kl + A/P

P is the resistivity, A is the cross-sectional area and k is the constant for the circuit

Using the value of the y-intercept find a value for P with the appropriate unit

The graph of L/R against L had the intercept of 9 but I have no idea where that fits in. All I know is the answer must be in Ohms

How do I calculate P?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
L/R = kl + A/P

is in the form Y=MX+C

where C=A/p

from a graph of Y vs X, how would you find C?
 
If the graph of L/R (y) against L (x) has an intercept of 9, you mean it crosses the y-axis (where x=0) at 9
Therefore 9 = 0 + A/P, so A/P is 9, from the intercept we don't have any info about the slope 'k'

From this you can't separate resistivity and A - you could have a very narrow gold wire (low P) or a thick carbon (high P) one with the same resistance, ie the same P/A
 
Yes it crosses the y-axis at 9.
Is k the gradient?

I calculated A is 6.1 x 10⁻⁸ m² Is the equation possible now?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top