How Does Torque Relate to RPM in a Gyroscopic Exercise Tool?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobo105
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exercise
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between the resistive forces of a gyroscopic exercise tool and its rotor's revolutions per minute (RPM). It notes that the tool generates 32 to 35 ft-lbs of peak torque at speeds of 9,000 to 13,000 RPM, with higher torque values reported for heavier models. Concerns are raised about wear on the interface between the gyro axis and the track, potentially leading to reduced functionality over time. The user seeks a formula to link RPM to torque, providing initial calculations for torque requirements at various speeds. The inquiry emphasizes the need for a clearer understanding of the torque necessary to maintain specific RPMs in gyroscopic exercise tools.
bobo105
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I want to know the relationship between the resistive forces of a gyroscopic exercise tool and the revolutions per minute of the rotor.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It generates from 32lbs to 35 lbs of torque when speeds of 9,000 - 13,000 RPMs are reached. I assume this means 32 ft-lbs to 35 ft lbs of torque, however the torque is zero unless you try to induce a torque, so I assume this is peak torque.

http://www.basegear.com/powerballgyro.html

these powerballs are made primarily of metal and have twice the weight of "regular" Powerball models and are more challenging to operate since up to 250Nm of torque is produced (250Nm = 184.4 ft lb).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powerball_(exercise_tool)

The interface between the narrow track and the ends of the gyro axis would wear out (loss of friction), resulting in an unusable powerball after a relatively short period of time. I don't know if this issue was ever fixed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks, but is there a formula that links the revs/min of the rotor of the gyroscope to the torque?

T = I \alpha

T = \frac{mr^2}{2} \times \frac{\omega}{t}

\omega = \frac{2 \pi R}{60}

T = \frac{mr^2 \pi R}{60t}

where R = revs/min, r = radius, m = mass, ω = angular velocity, t = time

So far I have found that a torque of 0.25Nm is required to rotate the gyroscope to 17000 revs/min in 1 second (with a mass of 0.45kg and a radius of 0.025m). However, I want to know, for example, how much torque is required to rotate the gyroscope at a constant 15000 revs/min.
 
Last edited:
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...

Similar threads

Back
Top