How Does Water Depth Influence Wave Speed in Shallow Water?

AI Thread Summary
The speed of waves in shallow water is influenced by gravity and water depth, leading to the conclusion that the correct formula for wave speed is v=√gh. The alternative formula, v=1/2gh^2, does not yield the appropriate units for velocity, as it results in cubic meters per second squared. Dimensional analysis shows that the units for the first equation are consistent with velocity, while the second is not. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding unit dimensions in physics problems. Overall, the analysis confirms that wave speed in shallow water is directly related to the square root of the product of gravity and water depth.
cyspope
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The speed of waving in shallow water depend only on the acceleration of gravity g, a quantity with dimensions L/T^2, and on the water depth h.

Which of the following formulas for the wave speed v could be correct?

a) v=1/2gh^2 b)v=√gh


Homework Equations


L = \frac{n\lambda_{n}}{2}

v^{2} = \frac{T}{\frac{m}{l}}

v = f\lambda


The Attempt at a Solution



I think I have to use one of above equations, but I don't know where to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are over complicating things. It's a simple dimensional analysis problem. Your a) equation comes out in units of m3/s2 while your b) equation comes out in m/s. Velocity has units of m/s, therefore equation b) is correct.

Actually deriving this equation for a water wave involves the inverse hyperbolic tangent function.
 
could you explain how the equation a) comes out to be m3/s2 because I don't understand the process.
 
So for a) you have 0.5gh2

Water Depth is measured in SI units of meters. When you square meters it becomes meters squared or more generally length squared.

"g" or the acceleration due to gravity has units of meters per second squared. Or more generally Length per unit time squared (written L/T^2)

0.5 does not have units so you can leave it out in a dimensional analysis problem.

Now multiply the units from h and g together.

Square meters times meters gives you cubic meters just like x2 times x gives you x3.

Seconds squared stays seconds squared.

More generally it comes out length cubed over time squared.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top