How Does Weak Coupling Between Matter and Space-Time Affect Cosmic Structures?

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
I have read that, on the scale of clusters (million light years) the effect of
the expansion of the universe is 10 million times smaller than the gravity
binding the cluster.
So space time, (flows) through the cluster (like a super fluid) or akin to a
group of logs staying in a fixed possition in a flowing stream, all poor
analogies but the best i can come up with.
This suggests that the (coulping) between matter and space time is
extremely weak.
My question, how can space time if viewed as a (super fluid or some thing
that gravitationaly bound bodies can ignore) carry massive bodies ie
gallaxies with it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In GR the coupling of the general expansion of space to objects within it is generally understood to be dependent on the average density of the universe compared with that of the object concerned.

If the average cosmological density is ~ 10-29 gms/cc and the average density of the cluster is ~ 10-22 gms/cc then the cosmological expansion effect (Hubble flow) is 10 million times smaller than the gravitational binding of the cluster.

However, the centre of mass of the cluster itself, or the super-cluster it belongs to, is carried along with the Hubble flow.

There is a question about how the gravitational field of the cluster/galaxy/stellar system within the cosmological field is treated. The local field is treated as Newtonian, which is the weak field limit of the Schwarzschild solution that itself is embedded in flat non-expanding Minkowskian space-time (at r \rightarrow \infty). If it is embedded in a cosmological metric as r \rightarrow \infty then bound orbits might themselves be expanding with the universe.

This is generally not thought to be the case, but with the present non-identification of DM and the non-explained Pioneer anomaly (~ equal to the Hubble acceleration cH) the standard understanding may be in need of revision.

Garth
 
Last edited:
Thanks Garth, all very confusing, to me any way, i wonder how the system
(space time and mass) stayed together when dark energy started an
accelerated expansion.
 
wolram said:
Thanks Garth, all very confusing, to me any way, i wonder how the system
(space time and mass) stayed together when dark energy started an
accelerated expansion.
DE just affects the cosmological expansion. If gravitationally bound objects are not affected by that expansion (as is normally thought to be the case) then they will not be affected by an accelerated expansion caused by DE.

Garth
 
Just had a look on the latest for the PA, a lot of talk here but not much on
new science, as usual it may be years befor an ansewer is forthcomming.

http://www.planetary.org/programs/projects/pioneer_anomaly/update_200511.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top