How Does Work Affect Acceleration on an Air Track?

  • Thread starter Thread starter msimard8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accleration Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of a 0.100 kg cart on an air track after performing 0.230 J of work over a distance of 10.0 cm. Participants emphasize the assumption of negligible friction due to the air track and the need to convert units correctly. The definition of work is highlighted, suggesting that it involves force and distance, which can help in determining acceleration. A hint is provided to consider Newton's second law, linking acceleration to the net force acting on the cart. The conversation underscores the importance of correctly applying physics principles to solve the problem.
msimard8
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Here is the queston.

A student in a physics lab pushed a 0.100 kg cart on an air track over a distance of 10.0 cm, doing 0.230 J of work. Calculate the acceleration of the cart.

The textbook doesn't show how to approach this problem. It is suppose to be bonus or somthing.

These are my thoughts

I am assuming there is no friction since the cart was on a air track

I converted everything to their proper units.

mass=0.100kg
w=0.0230 J
d =10.0 cm = 0.1m

I know accleration is change of velocity/time

I need a hint at least to figure out how to solve this.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, think of acceleration in terms of Newton's second law...

You have been given the amount of work done on the cart and the distance that work was performed. What is the definition of work? What is left to calculate from that definition, i.e. you have been given two things and there are three things in the basic definition for work.

Also, you have one too many leading zeros in the work number when you showed converting to proper units.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top