How efficient is a microwave oven

  • Thread starter Thread starter Homer D.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Microwave oven
AI Thread Summary
Microwave ovens typically operate at an efficiency of around 64%, converting electrical input into microwave energy, with the rest lost as heat. Efficiency can vary based on the type of food being heated, as polar molecules absorb microwaves more effectively. The discussion highlights a wide range of efficiency estimates, from 46% to 99%, suggesting that factors like food type and quantity significantly influence actual performance. There is also confusion regarding cooking times, as doubling the quantity of food does not necessarily require doubling the cooking time. Overall, while the conversion efficiency is relatively consistent, the effectiveness of microwave energy absorption varies with the food being cooked.
Homer D.
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This site was at the top of the Google results for "How efficient is a microwave oven"

I can't restart the old discussion, so I'll start a new thread.

Previous posters came up with numbers from 99% to 46%.
The Wikipedia page offers only this:
"A microwave oven converts only part of its electrical input into microwave energy. A typical consumer microwave oven consumes 1100 W of electricity in producing 700 W of microwave power, an efficiency of 64%. The other 400 W are dissipated as heat, mostly in the magnetron tube. Additional power is used to operate the lamps, AC power transformer, magnetron cooling fan, food turntable motor and the control circuits. Such wasted heat, along with heat from the product being microwaved, is exhausted as warm air through cooling vents."

Also of course, some energy exits into the room through the door's grid glass. It's not a perfect barrier, but a convenient compromise. Commercial food service units have no glass.

A member "cdotter" offered the observation "Wouldn't the efficiency depend on the type of food? A more polar molecule will rotate better than a less polar molecule."
I agree that efficiency also depends on what's in the oven. Presumably if running it empty the oven would still consume house current and yet nothing's on the turntable to get hot.

I'm wondering if there is any data about this. 99% 64% 46% is such a wide range.
 
Science news on Phys.org
I think based on your analysis, a wide range is appropriate, no?

One could relatively easily test this by timing how long it takes to boil some water though...
 
64% looks reasonable for an efficiency electric -> microwaves (depends on the model, too, of course). The part of the microwaves which gets absorbed by the food depends on the type of food, its quantity and distribution and the microwave, so the total efficiency will be a bit lower and variable.
 
Homer D. said:
A member "cdotter" offered the observation "Wouldn't the efficiency depend on the type of food? A more polar molecule will rotate better than a less polar molecule."
I agree that efficiency also depends on what's in the oven. Presumably if running it empty the oven would still consume house current and yet nothing's on the turntable to get hot.
The efficiency quoted (64%) refers to the conversion of electric power to microwaves.
How the microwaves are used is a different story.
 
What actually puzzles me most is the contention that when you double the quantity you must double the time to cook. If a given sausage is cooked in one minute and you want two, it seems they are done (split from steam) before the full two minutes are up.

termed "reciprocity failure"
 
Last edited:
Homer D. said:
What actually puzzles me most is the contention that when you double the quantity you must double the time to cook. If a given sausage is cooked in one minute and you want two, it seems they are done (split from steam) before the full two minutes are up.

That rule of thumb could apply for large items but the poor matching of the energy into some small items could compromise the actual Mains to RF efficiency.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...

Similar threads

Back
Top