How exactly do you find the net force between charges?

AI Thread Summary
To find the net force between charges, the formula k*q1*q2/r^2 applies, with the force direction being opposite for like charges. When two protons are involved, the forces cancel each other out, resulting in a net force of zero if they are equidistant. Introducing a third electron can also maintain a net force of zero, as the forces between the particles remain equal and opposite. The net force on each particle is the sum of the forces exerted by the others, leading to a balanced system. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving problems related to electrical forces.
paki123
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I was doing some homework problems, and I came across a couple I didn't know. I then realized I must have screwed up my understanding on electrical forces.


For an electrical force, if there are two protons, the force is k*q1*q2/r^2. The direction is in the opposite direction.

<---(+) (+)--->


Right?

What would be the net force there assuming the charge is e? Would it be 0 since they are in the opposite direction and have equal distances?

My question is it possible to have a third electron and still have the net force equal to 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes and Yes! If \textbf{F}_{i, j} means the force that charged particle j exerts on charged particle i, then \textbf{F}_{i, j} = \textbf{F}_{j, i}. In other words the forces between the particles are equal and opposite.

For three particles,
the force on particle 1 is \textbf{F}_{1, 2} + \textbf{F}_{1, 3}
the force on particle 2 is \textbf{F}_{2, 3} + \textbf{F}_{2, 1}
the force on particle 3 is \textbf{F}_{3, 1} + \textbf{F}_{3, 2}

So the net force, that is the forces on all three particles added together, is zero, because
\textbf{F}_{1, 2} = -\textbf{F}_{2, 1} and so on.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top