How far can a car travel along a parabolic trajectory between two points?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zeit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance a car travels along a parabolic trajectory between two points, A and B. The key focus is on finding the "curved distance" or arclength of a parabola, which requires calculus rather than simple distance formulas. The integral for arclength is introduced, specifically for a parabolic function y = ax², leading to a more complex integral involving trigonometric substitution. Participants clarify the derivatives of different parabolic equations, confirming that dy/dx varies based on the specific form of the parabola. The conversation emphasizes the mathematical complexity of the problem and the need for precise calculus techniques to solve it.
Zeit
Messages
38
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I don't know if I'm in the the good section to ask my question, I don't really know which type of mathematics my question is about.

If I'm in a car, according to a parabolic trajectory, which would be the distance traversed by the car between locations A and B?

Thanks a lot

Zeit

NB : Sorry for the mistakes
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your question is not very clear. A car is following a parabolic trajectory with you in it but what(or where) are points A and B? If this question is from some textbook please provide it as it is in the book.
 
Excuse me, I have some (many) problems to express myself in English.

No, it is not a question from a textbook, but from my mind. In fact, this example of a car is just another way to say : what is the equation to know the distance between any points of a parabola? Not the equation d² = (x'-x)² + (y'-y)², which is for a line, but the "curved distance".

Thanks
 
You posted this in the "general math" section but the answer requires calculus so this may not help you. This is a definitely "non-trivial" problem!

In general, if y= f(x), the "curved distance" (arclength) on the graph of y= f(x), from (a, f(a)) to (b, f(b)) is given by
\int_a^b\sqrt{1+ \frac{dy}{dx}}dx[/itex]<br /> <br /> In particular, for a &quot;parabolic trajectory&quot;, we can take y= ax<sup>2</sup> so that \frac{dy}{dx}= 2ax and the integral can be written as <br /> \int_a^b\sqrt{1+ 4a^2x^2}dx[/itex]&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; That can be done by a trigonometric substitution: let 2ax= tan\theta. Then 2adx= sec^2\theta d\theta and &lt;br /&gt; \sqrt{1+ 4a^2x^2}= \sqrt{1+ tan^2\theta}= \sqrt{sec^2\theta}= sec\theta&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; The integral becomes&lt;br /&gt; \int_{arctan a}^{arctan b} sec^3\theta d\theta= \int_{arctan a}^{arctan b} \frac{d\theta}{cos^3\theta}&lt;br /&gt; Since cosine is to an odd power, multiply both numerator and denominator by cos\theta&lt;br /&gt; \int_{arctan a}^{arctan b}\frac{cos\theta d\theta}{cos^4\theta}=\int_{arctan a}^{arctan b}\frac{cos\theta d\theta}{(1- sin^2\theta)^2}&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Now make the substitution u= sin\theta so that du= cos\theta d\theta. The integral becomes&lt;br /&gt; \int_{sin(arctan a)}^{sin(arctan b)}\frac{du}{(1- u^2)^2}&lt;br /&gt; which can be done by partial fractions.&lt;br /&gt; (To find sin(arctan a), draw a right triangle with opposite side of length a, near side of length b, so that the angle is [/itex]arctan a[/itex]. By the Pythagorean theorem, the hypotenus has length \sqrt{a^1+ 1}. sin(arctan a)= \frac{a}{\sqrt{a^2+1|}}. Do the same for sin(arctan b).)
 
Thanks HallsofIvy for the explanation.

But, in the first equation, you wrote dy/dx. Then, you wrote that because y = ax², dy/dx = 2ax and you substitute dy/dx in the first equation for 4a²x² in the second. My question is : in the first equation, isn't (dy/dx)² ?

[...] the "curved distance" (arclength) [...]

Thanks! :smile:
 
Zeit said:
Thanks HallsofIvy for the explanation.

But, in the first equation, you wrote dy/dx. Then, you wrote that because y = ax², dy/dx = 2ax and you substitute dy/dx in the first equation for 4a²x² in the second. My question is : in the first equation, isn't (dy/dx)² ?



Thanks! :smile:

Yes it should be.
 
Hi

In particular, for a "parabolic trajectory", we can take y= ax² so that dy/dx = 2ax

If y has more parameters, like y = a(x-h)²+k, what would be dy/dx? Or if y = ax²+bx+c, would dy/dx equal 2ax+b ?

Thanks
 
Zeit said:
Hi



If y has more parameters, like y = a(x-h)²+k, what would be dy/dx? Or if y = ax²+bx+c, would dy/dx equal 2ax+b ?

Thanks

That would be correct. And in the first case where you have y = a(x-h)²+k then dy/dx would be 2a(x-h) which shouldn't be hard to see.
 
Thanks for the answer.
 
Back
Top