How far from the starting point do the pieces fall on ground

AI Thread Summary
An object thrown at 20 m/s at an angle of π/3 radians splits into two equal pieces at its peak, with one piece having a speed of 0. The first piece continues its trajectory as if undisturbed, while the second piece, with double the horizontal speed after the split, travels a greater distance. The calculations suggest the first piece lands at approximately 17.32 meters, while the second piece travels about 34.64 meters. The discussion highlights the importance of conservation of momentum and careful consideration of the variables involved. The book's answer is deemed incorrect based on the provided analysis.
annalian
Messages
56
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


An object is thrown with speed 20 m/Sunder the angle pi/3 rad with the horisontal direction. In the highest point, the object is divised into two pieces with same weights. One of them, after the division has the speed 0.
How far from the starting point do the pieces fall on ground?

Homework Equations


t=2v0sina/g

The Attempt at a Solution


The piece that has the speed 0:
x1=v0^2sin2a/2g=17.32 m
x2=v0^2sin2a/g=34.64 m
The answer in the book is 10, 20 meters.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
annalian said:

Homework Statement


An object is thrown with speed 20 m/Sunder the angle pi/3 rad with the horisontal direction. In the highest point, the object is divised into two pieces with same weights. One of them, after the division has the speed 0.
How far from the starting point do the pieces fall on ground?

Homework Equations


t=2v0sina/g

The Attempt at a Solution


The piece that has the speed 0:
x1=v0^2sin2a/2g=17.32 m
x2=v0^2sin2a/g=34.64 m
The answer in the book is 10, 20 meters.

This problem is in two parts. Can you describe what happens in each part?

Because of this, you will need to be careful about what you mean by ##v_0## and ##t##. You will have to define all your variables carefully before you use any equations to relate them.

PS In fact, it's in three parts!
 
PeroK said:
This problem is in two parts. Can you describe what happens in each part?

Because of this, you will need to be careful about what you mean by ##v_0## and ##t##. You will have to define all your variables carefully before you use any equations to relate them.
The first piece follows the movement as if nothing happened (as if it was the object without being devised.)
That's why for it I used L=v0^2sin2a/g
v0=20 m/S is the initial speed of the object
a-the angle the object forms with the horizon.
The second piece just does half of the complete movement, as when it reaches the top, the speed becomes 0. So the road is half of the one of the first piece.
 
annalian said:
The first piece follows the movement as if nothing happened (as if it was the object without being devised.)
That's why for it I used L=v0^2sin2a/g
v0=20 m/S is the initial speed of the object
a-the angle the object forms with the horizon.
The second piece just does half of the complete movement, as when it reaches the top, the speed becomes 0. So the road is half of the one of the first piece.

I think your answer is better than the one in the book. Do you think conservation of momentum might be involved?

The book answer can't possibly be correct for the problem as stated.
 
PeroK said:
I think your answer is better than the one in the book. Do you think conservation of momentum might be involved?

The book answer can't possibly be correct for the problem as stated.
No, we haven't repeated momentum yet. Do you think the answer will be right, by using the momentum?
 
annalian said:
No, we haven't repeated momentum yet. Do you think the answer will be right, by using the momentum?

I would perhaps leave this question. The book answer is clearly not right. But, you might ask yourself why it said the two pieces were of equal weight? Why is the size of the two pieces important?
 
PeroK said:
I would perhaps leave this question. The book answer is clearly not right. But, you might ask yourself why it said the two pieces were of equal weight? Why is the size of the two pieces important?
to use teh expression mv=m1v1+m2v2
v=v1+v2, v1=0
v2=v
 
annalian said:
to use teh expression mv=m1v1+m2v2
v=v1+v2, v1=0
v2=v

Shouldn't that be ##m_1 = m_2 = \frac{m}{2}, \ \ v_2 = 2v##?
 
  • Like
Likes annalian
PeroK said:
Shouldn't that be ##m_1 = m_2 = \frac{m}{2}, \ \ v_2 = 2v##?
Yes, you're right
 
  • #10
annalian said:
Yes, you're right
So in this case, the road for the first one would be the same, but for the second, I would have to add to the first one v0^2sin2a/2g, where v0=40 m/s?
 
  • #11
annalian said:
So in this case, the road for the first one would be the same, but for the second, I would have to add to the first one v0^2sin2a/2g, where v0=40 m/s?

No, you need to think more carefully about the horizontal speed of the second piece. It is ##v## until the highest point, and ##2v## after that.
 
  • #12
PeroK said:
No, you need to think more carefully about the horizontal speed of the second piece. It is ##v## until the highest point, and ##2v## after that.
Yes, I said it is 20^2sin2a/2g+40^2sin2a/g. Is this correct?
 
  • #13
annalian said:
Yes, I said it is 20^2sin2a/2g+40^2sin2a/g. Is this correct?

Yes, of course, that's correct.

I was thinking that simply it goes 3 times as far as the first piece! I wasn't thinking in terms of ##g## and angles and things.
 
  • Like
Likes annalian
Back
Top