How Fast and How Long Does a Pebble Travel in a Projectile Experiment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter carltonblues
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projectile
AI Thread Summary
A PHYS1001 student conducts an experiment using a slingshot to hit a target 40 meters away, needing to aim 4.85 meters above the target. The angle of projection is calculated to be approximately 6.91 degrees. Using the equations of motion under gravity, the time of flight is determined to be about 0.993 seconds, and the initial velocity of the pebble is found to be approximately 40.6 m/sec. An alternative method for calculating the trajectory is also discussed, emphasizing the relationship between initial velocity, angle, and time of flight. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving projectile motion problems effectively.
carltonblues
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
God I hate projectiles..

A PHYS1001 student uses a slingshot to project a pebble at her lecturer
(shoulder height) who is standing 40 m away. After extensive experiments she
finds that to hit the target she must aim 4.85 m above the target. Determine the
velocity of the pebble on leaving the slingshot and the time of flight.

Can some one start me off, with the correct formula to use. I am stumped..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
carltonblues said:
God I hate projectiles..

A PHYS1001 student uses a slingshot to project a pebble at her lecturer
(shoulder height) who is standing 40 m away. After extensive experiments she
finds that to hit the target she must aim 4.85 m above the target. Determine the
velocity of the pebble on leaving the slingshot and the time of flight.

Can some one start me off, with the correct formula to use. I am stumped..
The projectile is required to hit the target at the same height it leaves the student. Furthermore, the Angle θ (above horizontal) at which the projectile leaves the student is given by:
tan(θ) = (4.85)/(40) = (0.121) ::: ⇒ θ = (6.91 deg)

The standard equations for projectile height z(t) under constant gravitational acceleration "g" and for horizontal distance "x" are given by:
z(t) = z0 + vz0t - (1/2)gt2 :::: Eq #1
x(t) = x0 + vx0t :::: Eq #2

Let T be the time of flight. The problem requires that {z(T) = z0} and that {x(T) - x0 = (40 m)}. Placing these into Eqs #1 & #2 we get:
z(T) = z0 = z0 + vz0T - (1/2)(9.81)T2
⇒ 0 = vz0T - (1/2)(9.81)T2
⇒ 0 = vz0 - (4.91)T
⇒ T = vz0/(4.91) :::: Eq #3

x(T) - x0 = 40 = vx0T
⇒ T = (40)/vx0 :::: Eq #4

We now multiply Eq #3 by Eq #4:
T2 = {40/4.91}*{vz0/vx0} =
= (8.15)*tan(θ) =
= (8.15)*(0.121) =
= (0.986)
⇒ T = (0.993 sec)

Placing this last result into Eq #4 and solving for vx0:
(0.993) = (40)/vx0 ::: ⇒ vx0 = (40)/(0.993) = (40.3 m/sec)
⇒ v0 = vx0/cos(θ) = (40.3)/cos(6.91 deg)
⇒ v0 = (40.6 m/sec)


~~
 
life saver!
 
There's another way, though not too different from xanthym's.

The trajectory that the pebble follows is a parabola under the (assumed constant) gravitational field of earth. If the pebble were projected with an initial velocity \vec{u} at an initial elevation \alpha (computed just as xanthym did) then the equation of the trajectory turns out to be,

y = xtan\alpha - \frac{1}{2}\frac{gx^2}{u^2}sec^2\alpha

In principle you can find u directly from this equation given y = 0, x (= range) and alpha. Once you have that, use Range = u\cos\alpha*Time of Flight to find the time of flight.

The equation here isn't really a shortcut as in some cases, the algebraic calculations are easier if you follow the step-by-step fundamental method. Yet its worthwhile to know the equation, as it relates all the parameters of motion and gives you y as a function of x.

Cheers
Vivek

PS--It would be good exercise for you to derive this equation of trajectory yourself. Hint: xanthym's equations are sufficient to do this.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top