The typical journey for a person who self-teaches (and many that get their learning in school courses) is that they tackle Calculus before they "master" algebra and trigonometry and experience many awkward moments in Calculus because of things they don't know about algebra nd trigonometry.
If you encounter such awkward moments in a course then it has consequences for your grade. However, if you are self-teaching, such awkward moments are private psychological phenomena and its up to you whether you want to endure them.
Some people have a personality that prefers to go step-by-step and be absolutely confident about what its doing. Other people are ... shall we say "adventurous". They begin studies or projects without a firm grasp of what they are doing. There is no general rule about which personality type is preferable. Since your original post hints at some impatience, my guess is that your are the adventurous type, but you are trying to tame your natural inclinations by using step-by-step materials.
My suggestion is to go ahead and look at some Calculus lessons. See if you know enough algebra to understand them. If you don't then that's more motivation to study algebra.
If I've misjudged your personality and you need confidence at each step in order to motivate yourself, then you will naturally find a pace of studying algebra that suits you.
Whatever approach you take, you will find that Calculus is a culture shock if you have only studied its nominal prerequisites. For people who don't like feeling insecure, the prerequisites for Calculus should actually include an introduction to Logic, including an introduction to quantifiers ("for each", "there exists"). It should also include an introduction to formal mathematics ( e.g. The culture that definitions mean what they say, not how we Platonically imagine them.) Many students get their introduction to Logic and formal mathematics in their first Calculus course and often it is not a gentle introduction.