How force works on two strings connected by a mass

AI Thread Summary
When pulling two strings connected by a mass, the tension in each string behaves differently based on the speed of the pull. If the A string is pulled slowly, the B string experiences a greater tension due to the additional weight, causing it to break first. Conversely, if the A string is pulled suddenly, the acceleration increases significantly, resulting in the tension in the A string surpassing that of the B string, which remains intact. This behavior can be explained using Newton's second law, where the net force changes based on the rate of acceleration. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing the forces at play in such systems.
Ezio3.1415
Messages
159
Reaction score
1
So if I slowly pull the A string first B string will tear apart... Cause the A string will expand and it will pull the mass and B string... So B string will reach its breaking weight before A... Cause B has an additional weight mg working on it..

But if I suddenly pull the A string,it will tear apart but the B string will remain intact... I am trying to understand why this happens... I mean what is the exact mechanism here?
 

Attachments

  • tension.jpg
    tension.jpg
    4.2 KB · Views: 476
Physics news on Phys.org
Applying Newton's second law to the block we have

Fnet = ma
FA - FB + mg = ma
FA - FB = m(a-g).

If you pull it slowly, acceleration a is negligible and we get

FA - FB = -mg < 0
FA < FB

FB is larger.

But if you pull very fast than a is very large and we get

FA - FB = m(a-g) >0

FA > FB

FA is larger.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you... :)
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top