How hard is Real Analysis 2 compared to Real Analysis 1?

AI Thread Summary
Real Analysis 1 is generally considered challenging, focusing on the properties of the real number system, point set theory, and functions of one variable, including limits, continuity, and differentiability. Real Analysis 2 builds on this foundation, introducing functions of multiple variables, partial differentiation, and multiple integration, along with advanced topics like Taylor Series and various theorems. While some find Real Analysis 2 manageable if they have a solid grasp of the first course, it is acknowledged that the transition requires understanding the techniques and proofs established in Analysis 1. Taking Real Analysis 2 alongside Elementary Number Theory is viewed as feasible, as Elementary Number Theory is perceived to involve basic algebraic manipulations and is not considered difficult. Overall, a strong understanding of Analysis 1 is crucial for success in Analysis 2.
SMA_01
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
Is it a lot harder? I'm taking Real Analysis 1 this semester, and am planning on taking the second part to the course in the Winter.
Also, would it be a bad idea to take Real Analysis 2 and Elementary Number Theory in one semester?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I found it noticeably harder, but it's not a really big leap or anything.
 
Please post the course descriptions of both Real Analysis 1 and 2; those course titles mean completely different things between different schools.
 
PieceOfPi said:
Please post the course descriptions of both Real Analysis 1 and 2; those course titles mean completely different things between different schools.

Analysis 1:

Properties of the real number system; point set theory for the real line including the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem; sequences, functions of one variable: limits and continuity, differentiability, Reimann integrability.

Analysis 2:

Includes the rigorous study of functions of two and more variables, partial differentiation and multiple integration. Special topics include: Taylor Series, Implicit Function Theorem, Weierstrass Approximation Theorem, Arzela-Ascoli Theorem.
 
I can't comment on the analysis part, but elementary number theory is not very hard. All the theorems involve basic algebraic manipulations, and mods (which you should be use to by now).
 
SMA_01 said:
Analysis 1:

Properties of the real number system; point set theory for the real line including the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem; sequences, functions of one variable: limits and continuity, differentiability, Reimann integrability.

Analysis 2:

Includes the rigorous study of functions of two and more variables, partial differentiation and multiple integration. Special topics include: Taylor Series, Implicit Function Theorem, Weierstrass Approximation Theorem, Arzela-Ascoli Theorem.

If you got through Analysis 1 alive, then you won't find Analysis 2 much harder. In fact, I think Analysis 1 is the hardest course since you got to get used to the techniques and proofs of analysis. In analysis 2, you're already used to that. So you won't find it too difficult.
 
SMA_01 said:
Analysis 1:

Properties of the real number system; point set theory for the real line including the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem; sequences, functions of one variable: limits and continuity, differentiability, Reimann integrability.

Analysis 2:

Includes the rigorous study of functions of two and more variables, partial differentiation and multiple integration. Special topics include: Taylor Series, Implicit Function Theorem, Weierstrass Approximation Theorem, Arzela-Ascoli Theorem.

Thanks! Based on the course descriptions, Analysis 2 sounds like a very reasonable sequence that follows Analysis 1. It can hard in a sense that the materials build upon what you learned in analysis 1 (afterall, you need to be solid on the analysis of R^1 in order to learn the analysis of R^n). On the other hand, if you have a solid understanding of analysis 1, analysis 2 shouldn't be too hard, since you will see same kinds of techniques from analysis 1 again.
 
Thank you, that was helpful :smile:
 

Similar threads

Back
Top