How high can a high jumper clear on the moon compared to on Earth?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jump Physics
AI Thread Summary
A high jumper who clears a 2m bar on Earth can theoretically clear about 11.6m on the moon due to the lower gravity, calculated by equating gravitational potential energy on both celestial bodies. However, the mark scheme indicates that the jumper's center of mass (COM) only rises about 1m during the jump, which is crucial for accurate calculations. This estimation of the COM height is not clearly stated in the exam, leading to confusion among students. The discussion highlights that the jumper's technique involves a run-up and bending of the legs, which means the actual height of the COM during the jump is less than the height of the bar. Understanding these dynamics is essential for solving such physics problems accurately.
Jimmy87
Messages
692
Reaction score
19

Homework Statement


If a high jumper can clear a 2m bar on Earth, how high is the bar he can clear on the moon assuming it is done under the same conditions as on the Earth. Acceleration due to gravity on the moon is 1.7 m/s^2.

Homework Equations


GPE = mgh

The Attempt at a Solution


I set mgh on Earth equal to mgh on the moon as the athlete exerts the same starting energy transfer. I got a factor of 5.8 giving the bar on the moon at 11.6m. However, the mark scheme says the athlete lifts his COM 1m on Earth. I have no idea how you are suppose to know this? I get that the COM goes under the bar but what makes it half the height of the bar? This is a proper past exam question and what I have put in the question is all they give you! Please help. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jimmy87 said:
However, the mark scheme says the athlete lifts his COM 1m on Earth. I have no idea how you are suppose to know this?
Good question! Perhaps you supposed to 'estimate' the height of the athlete's COM as being about 1 m off the ground when he leaves the ground. (Not cool for an exam question, unless it's free response and any reasonable estimate is OK.)
 
  • Like
Likes Jimmy87
Doc Al said:
Good question! Perhaps you supposed to 'estimate' the height of the athlete's COM as being about 1 m off the ground when he leaves the ground. (Not cool for an exam question, unless it's free response and any reasonable estimate is OK.)
Phew! Glad I wasn't missing something. I have attached the paper and mark scheme - it's question 3b (ii). It doesn't even say the 1m COM is an estimate - it states it as though it is a fact! Thanks
 

Attachments

Jimmy87 said:
Phew! Glad I wasn't missing something. I have attached the paper and mark scheme - it's question 3b (ii). It doesn't even say the 1m COM is an estimate - it states it as though it is a fact!
Read the question exactly as written in the document you posted. It's a bit sneaky, but you actually have all the info you need -- since the question gives you the answer!
 
Jimmy87 said:
the mark scheme says the athlete lifts his COM 1m on Earth
This is a common blunder.
A high jumper does not arrive at the bar in a vertical position then jump. Would not go very high that way.
The jump starts with a run up. Approaching the bar, the jumper leans back and bends the legs. A combination of the forward momentum and leg extension from that low position produces the upward velocity needed. So the mass centre has to lifted from rather lower than 1m.
 
  • Like
Likes Jimmy87
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top