How high was the package above the ground when it was thrown

  • Thread starter Thread starter Perseverence
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ground
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the height from which a package was thrown from a helicopter, given that it takes 16 seconds to reach the ground. The initial attempt incorrectly focused on the distance the package traveled upward until its velocity reached zero, resulting in a height of 11.28 meters. Participants clarified that the actual question pertains to the total height of the helicopter above the ground, which is significantly greater. The correct approach involves using the kinematic equation for vertical motion to find the total height, which aligns with the book's answer of 1040 meters. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting the problem statement to arrive at the right solution.
Perseverence
Messages
88
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement

( p 49 sterling)
Ignoring air resistance, if it takes 16 seconds for a package to strike the ground, how high above the ground was a package when it was thrown upward from the stationary helicopter at 15 m/s per second[/B]

Homework Equations


V=Vo+at
D=Vot+(1/2)at^2

The Attempt at a Solution


It seems pretty straightforward that the solution would be the distance from the initial throw upward to the upward velocity becoming zero.
V=Vo+at
0=15+(-10)t
1.5 sec =time (to Vy=0)

Then plugging in 1.5sec into
D=Vot+(1/2)at^2 to get 11.28m. But that is not the solution in the book. The solution in the book is 1040m.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perseverence said:

Homework Statement

( p 49 sterling)
Ignoring air resistance, if it takes 16 seconds for a package to strike the ground, how high above the ground was a package when it was thrown upward from the stationary helicopter at 15 m/s per second[/B]

Homework Equations


V=Vo+at
D=Vot+(1/2)at^2

The Attempt at a Solution


It seems pretty straightforward that the solution would be the distance from the initial throw upward to the upward velocity becoming zero.
V=Vo+at
0=15+(-10)t
1.5 sec =time (to Vy=0)

Then plugging in 1.5sec into
D=Vot+(1/2)at^2 to get 11.28m. But that is not the solution in the book. The solution in the book is 1040m.
You are making a massive mistake and missing steps. You are calculating how far up the book will go when its velocity becomes 0. That is 11.28.

However, the question asks for how high up the helicopter is, not how high the book went up before it became 0.

Try again.
 
lekh2003 said:
You are making a massive mistake and missing steps. You are calculating how far up the book will go when its velocity becomes 0. That is 11.28.

However, the question asks for how high up the helicopter is, not how high the book went up before it became 0.

Try again.
if you are in a helicopter and something in the air, when it reaches as high as it will go, it's Vertical Velocity will be zero. That is the distance from the helicopter
lekh2003 said:
You are making a massive mistake and missing steps. You are calculating how far up the book will go when its velocity becomes 0. That is 11.28.

However, the question asks for how high up the helicopter is, not how high the book went up before it became 0.

Try again.

Oh my gosh
You're right, I was calculating the wrong distance! I figured out what I was doing wrong. Thank you so much for your help!
 
  • Like
Likes lekh2003
Perseverence said:
Oh my gosh
You're right, I was calculating the wrong distance! I figured out what I was doing wrong. Thank you so much for your help!
It's good that you realized. You're welcome.
 
The equation you are looking for is the kinematic equation for 1D vertical motion with no air drag. y = y0 + v0 t - gt^2 / 2 , t is the time of flight from y0 to y=0.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top