MHB How Is $\delta = \sqrt{9+\epsilon}-3$ the Largest Choice in a Limit Proof?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on verifying the limit proof for $\lim_{{x}\to{3}}x^2=9$ using a geometric argument. The approach involves analyzing the function $f(x)=x^2$ and constructing a geometric representation with vertical and horizontal line segments. By drawing these segments, the relationship $f(3)+\varepsilon=f(3+\delta)$ is established, leading to the equation $9+\varepsilon=(3+\delta)^2$. The largest choice for $\delta$ is derived by applying the square root property, resulting in $\delta = \sqrt{9+\epsilon}-3$. This geometric interpretation effectively demonstrates the limit proof.
Dethrone
Messages
716
Reaction score
0
Verify, by a geometric argument, that the largest possible choice of $\delta$ for showing that $\lim_{{x}\to{3}}x^2=9$ is $\delta = \sqrt{9+\epsilon}-3$

I have no clue, hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With $f(x)=x^2$, I would begin with:

$$f(3)+\varepsilon=f(3+\delta)$$
 
I can expand it...
$f(3+\delta)=9+6\delta +(\delta)^2$, but I still don't see a geometric argument from that :(
 
Draw the curve $f(x)=x^2$. Now, on the $x$-axis at $x=3$, draw a vertical line segment up to the curve. Where this line touches the curve, draw a horizontal line segment to the left, until it reaches the $y$-axis...this is $f(3)$. Now, go back to the vertical line, and choose a distance $\delta$ from $x=3$, which will be $3+\delta$. Draw a line up to the curve, and the to the left to the $y$-axis. It will be at $f(3)+\varepsilon$. Thus we see from this construction, that we must have:

$$f(3)+\varepsilon=f(3+\delta)$$

$$9+\varepsilon=(3+\delta)^2$$

Instead of expanding, use the square root property, and take the positive root, and you will have shown what is required. :D
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
6K