How Is Energy Calculated for Four Charges at a Square's Corners?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Riogho
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatics
AI Thread Summary
The energy required to assemble four identical charges at the corners of a square with side length r can be calculated by considering the process of bringing each charge in from infinity. The first charge is placed without any energy cost, while the second charge requires work based on the electrostatic potential energy between the first and second charges at distance r. The third charge is then added, and its potential energy is calculated relative to the first two charges, followed by the fourth charge, which interacts with all three previous charges. The total energy is the sum of the work done for each charge as it is brought into position. This method effectively illustrates the principles of electrostatic potential energy in a multi-charge system.
Riogho
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
What is the energy required to bring four identical charges in from infinity such that they occupy the corners of a square with side length r?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm presuming you're presently learning about electrostatic potential energy. You approach the problem by imagining assembling the square charge by charge in "empty space". The first charge can come in for free, since there's nothing else around. The second charge comes in from infinity down to a distance r from the first charge. Recall the relationship between work done on that second charge and the value of the final potential energy between the two charges.

You then continue this by placing the third charge at one of the remaining corners of the square, then finally placing the fourth charge at the vacant vertex. Each additional does not affect the results from the previous stages; the total work done will just be the sum for each of these three steps.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top