How Is k Normalized in Schrodinger's Equation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the normalization of the wave number k in Schrödinger's equation for a specific potential distribution divided into three regions. The user successfully derives k as k = √(2mE)/h but struggles with the concept of normalizing k, referred to as k_hat. They find that using the definition of [E] = π²h²/(2ML²) leads to the correct expression for k_hat. The user seeks clarification on how [E] is derived and the purpose of k_hat in the context of their assignment. Ultimately, the normalization process is essential for ensuring the wave function remains physically meaningful.
bumclouds
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

Homework Statement


I have an assignment, which is to Solve Schrodinger's equations, for a certain potential distribution, which can be divided up into three regions.

A solution for one of the regions is of the form: Ae^{kx}



If you substitute this into Schrodinger's equation (time independant, one dimension) and solve for k, you get this:

Schrodingers:
\frac{-h}{2m} \frac{d^{2}}{dx^{2}} \Psi (x) + Vo \Psi (x) = E \Psi (x)

Solve for k:
k = \frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{h}

I know this part is right because I've seen it written on the board a couple of times, and it's also what I get on paper.

But then there's the next bit, which I don't get. Apparently it's 'normalising k' which I just don't get..

k = \frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{h}

k\overline{^}\overline{} = \frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{h}.\frac{L}{2}

[E] = \frac{\pi^{2}h^{2}}{2ML^{2}}

k_hat = \frac{L}{2} . \frac{\sqrt{2m}}{h} . \sqrt{E}

k_hat = \frac{L}{2} . \frac{\sqrt{2m}}{h} . \sqrt{\frac{E[E]}{[E]}}

k_hat = \frac{L}{2} . \frac{\sqrt{2m}}{h} . \sqrt{[E]} \sqrt{Ehat}

k_hat = \frac{\pi}{2} \sqrt{Ehat}

Homework Equations



None.


The Attempt at a Solution



If I rearrange k = \frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{h} and make E the subject,

I get ..

E = \frac{h^{2}khat^{2}}{2m}

and maybe this is where I go wrong.. because I assume E = [E] ?

Subtituting [E] into the second last step in section 2 above yields:

khat = \frac{L}{2} khat \sqrt{Ehat}

and that doesn't equal the last step >_<

EDIT: ahh.. if I use their definition of [E], [E] = \frac{\pi^{2}h^{2}}{2ML^{2}}
I arrive at the right answer..


so how did they come up with [E] = \frac{\pi^{2}h^{2}}{2ML^{2}}??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is k_hat and what are you trying to achieve, an expression for E?
 
Sorry! I've edited my above post.. Now it makes more sense :)

What I'm really after is how did they (my teacher) come up with [E] and what is it?


k_hat is apparently a normalised k
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top