How Is Maximum Kinetic Energy Calculated for an Object on a Circular Path?

  • Thread starter Thread starter duplaimp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Maximum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum kinetic energy of an object moving in a circular path, given a tension limit of 16N. Initially, the user mistakenly equated tension with weight to find mass, but was corrected that mass is not needed for the kinetic energy calculation. The key formula derived is K = 1/2 * F * r, where F is the tension and r is the radius of the circular path. The final conclusion is that the maximum kinetic energy can be calculated directly using this formula without needing to determine the mass. The correct approach simplifies the problem significantly.
duplaimp
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am trying to solve a problem but I can't figure how to continue..
There's an object moving in a circular path with radius 0.5m in an horizontal surface. The rope will break if the tension exceeds 16N. What is the maximum kinect energy?

So r = 0.5m

T = 16N

K=\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}

How can I find m and v? I tried with T = mg <=> 16 = m(9.8) <=> m = 1.63kg but I don't know if it is correct. But besides that I can't figure how to find v
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Make use of the fact that the motion is circular.
 
I also tried that

v = \sqrt{a*r}

But how to find a? Will it be g?
 
yes..
 
It is solved :) Thanks!
 
duplaimp said:
I also tried that

v = \sqrt{a*r}

But how to find a?
Just rearrange that to write a in terms of v and r. Then apply Newton's 2nd law.
Will it be g?
No.
 
Doc Al said:
Just rearrange that to write a in terms of v and r. Then apply Newton's 2nd law.

No.

But with that I don't get the right answer. Just to confirm: is the mass correct?
 
duplaimp said:
But with that I don't get the right answer.
Show what you did with it.
Just to confirm: is the mass correct?
You mean the value of the mass you calculated in post #1? No, that's not correct. For some reason, you set the tension equal to the weight of the mass. Why would you do that?

Hint: You don't need the mass to answer the question. It asks for kinetic energy, not mass.
 
Doc Al said:
Show what you did with it.

a = \frac{v^{2}}{r} and then F = m*a <=> F = m*\frac{v^{2}}{r}
<=> 16 = 1.63 * \frac{v^{2}}{0.5}

But since 1.63 isn't right it will give wrong results

Doc Al said:
You mean the value of the mass you calculated in post #1? No, that's not correct. For some reason, you set the tension equal to the weight of the mass. Why would you do that?

Hint: You don't need the mass to answer the question. It asks for kinetic energy, not mass.

I did that because I couldn't figure any other way to find the mass.. trial and error

But K=\frac{1}{2}mv^{2} so I need the mass
 
  • #10
duplaimp said:
a = \frac{v^{2}}{r} and then F = m*a <=> F = m*\frac{v^{2}}{r}
Perfect so far.
<=> 16 = 1.63 * \frac{v^{2}}{0.5}

But since 1.63 isn't right it will give wrong results
Yes, your value for mass is wrong. (Hint: There's not enough information to determine the mass. But you don't need it!)
I did that because I couldn't figure any other way to find the mass.. trial and error

But K=\frac{1}{2}mv^{2} so I need the mass
You do not need the mass, you need the kinetic energy. So you just need to solve for 1/2mv2. Go back and stare at the first equation in this post.
 
  • #11
Doc Al said:
Perfect so far.

Yes, your value for mass is wrong. (Hint: There's not enough information to determine the mass. But you don't need it!)

You do not need the mass, you need the kinetic energy. So you just need to solve for 1/2mv2. Go back and stare at the first equation in this post.

Ok, finally I figured that :P

So, i did this:
F = ma <=> a = \frac{F}{m}

a = \frac{v^{2}}{r} <=> v^{2}=a*r <=> v^{2}=\frac{F}{m}*r

K = \frac{1}{2}*m*\frac{F*r}{m} = \frac{1}{2}*F*r

Thanks!
 
  • #12
duplaimp said:
Ok, finally I figured that :P

So, i did this:
F = ma <=> a = \frac{F}{m}

a = \frac{v^{2}}{r} <=> v^{2}=a*r <=> v^{2}=\frac{F}{m}*r

K = \frac{1}{2}*m*\frac{F*r}{m} = \frac{1}{2}*F*r

Thanks!
Cool.

A short cut would be to recognize mv2 when you see it:

F = \frac{m v^2}{r}
Thus:
m v^2 = F r
\frac{1}{2}m v^2 = \frac{1}{2}F r
 
Back
Top