How is possible that the magnetic field around electron is dipole but it's one circle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of the magnetic field around an electron, which is described as a dipole despite the electron being a point-like particle. It explains that the intrinsic spin of the electron can be viewed as a magnetic dipole moment, with specific constants like the reduced Planck constant and the Bohr magneton involved. The relationship between a rotating electric charge and a magnetic dipole field is established, indicating that the circular motion of charge creates a dipole field. Maxwell's laws are referenced to illustrate how the electric and magnetic fields are derived from monopole and dipole configurations. Overall, the conversation clarifies the complex interplay between charge rotation and magnetic field generation.
stmartin
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
How is possible that the magnetic field around electron is dipole but it's one circle?


Best regards.

p.s thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry, I don't understand what you're asking. Perhaps more words would help, or maybe even a picture?
 
indeed, more words, please. "It's one circle" doesn't mean much to me. What is one circle? The electron? The electron is one circle? What does that even mean.

An electron is not a circle, it's a point-like particle. Also, the electron possesses an intrinsic spin of magnitude \hbar/2and this spin can be thought of in some sense as a magnetic dipole with magnitude g \mu_B /2. Where \hbar is the reduced Planck Constant, \mu_B is the Bohr magneton, and g is a pure number approximately equal to 2 (it's actually a little bigger, closer to 2.002).
 
stmartin said:
How is possible that the magnetic field around electron is dipole but it's one circle?
Best regards. p.s thanks for the help.
The magnetic field around the electron associated with its spin is indeed
called a dipole moment. So your question is: How can a circular current
generate a dipole field.

The field of a rotating electric charge happens to be equal to the field of
a magnetic dipole. (two adjacent opposite magnetic charges: two monopoles)

This can be shown using Maxwell's laws:

<br /> \textsf{\textbf{E}}\ = -\textsf{grad}\ V - \frac{\partial <br /> \textbf{A}}{\partial t},\ \qquad \ \ \textsf{\textbf{B}}\ = <br /> \textsf{curl}\ \textbf{A} <br />
Monopole field

The electric point charge (monopole) is a delta function.

Q\ =\ \delta(r)

It's potential field V is:

V\ =\ \frac{1}{r}

It's electric field is is found by differentiating in x,y and z (gradient):

<br /> \textsf{E}_x\ = \frac{x}{r^3}, \quad <br /> \textsf{E}_y\ = \frac{y}{r^3}, \quad <br /> \textsf{E}_z\ = \frac{z}{r^3}<br />Dipole field

If we differentiate a delta function we get two adjacent and opposite
delta functions (a dipole)

Q\ =\ \frac{\partial}{\partial z}\ \delta(r)

To obtain the dipole field we differentiate the monopole field in z as well:

V\ =\ <br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial z}\left(\frac{1}{r}\right)\ =\ <br /> \frac{z}{r^3}

Which gives the electric potentials after differentiation in x, y and z:

\textsf{E}_x\ = \frac{3z}{r^5}x, \qquad \textsf{E}_y\ = <br /> \ \frac{3z}{r^5}y, \qquad \textsf{E}_z\ = \ \frac{3z}{r^5}z - \frac{1}{r^3}


Rotating point charge field

This current gives rise to a magnetic vector potential A. The currents
in the x direction are given by a delta function differentiated in the y
direction, while the current in the y direction is give by a differentiation
in the x direction: Two orthogonal skews yield a rotation, like:

<br /> \partial_x - \partial_y \qquad = \qquad \uparrow\downarrow\ +\ \rightleftarrows \qquad = \qquad \circlearrowright<br />

So we have for the electric currents Jx, Jy and Jz:

<br /> J_x \ \ =\ -\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\ \delta(r), \qquad <br /> J_y \ \ =\ \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\ \delta(r), \qquad <br /> J_z\ =\ 0

We obtain for the Vector Potential fields Ax, Ay and Az after
differentiating 1/r in the same way:

<br /> \qquad A_x\ =\ - <br /> \frac{y}{r^3}, \qquad A_y\ =\ <br /> \frac{x}{r^3}, \qquad A_z\ =\ 0

To obtain the magnetic fields B we take the curl of the vector
potential A and we get:

\textsf{B}_x\ = \frac{3z}{r^5}x, \qquad \textsf{B}_y\ = <br /> \ \frac{3z}{r^5}y, \qquad \textsf{B}_z\ = \ \frac{3z}{r^5}z - \frac{1}{r^3}

Which is mathematically equal to the electric dipole field.
Regards, Hans
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top