How is proper acceleration defined?

  • Thread starter Thread starter OMFG Clown
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
OMFG Clown
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If we are accelerating in a uniform grav field, we are unable to feel it.

In that case, are we still considered as undergoing proper acceleration? Will we follow a hyperbolic path?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OMFG Clown said:
If we are accelerating in a uniform grav field, we are unable to feel it.

In that case, are we still considered as undergoing proper acceleration? Will we follow a hyperbolic path?
Hi OMFG Clown
No, in this case acceleration is defined by forces acting on the body. Measurable by an accelerometer. Free falling in a g field would have a null reading ,,no force.
There is still coordinate acceleration as measured by external frames. As charted in at least some of those frames it would be a hyperbolic path.
So your motion would be inertial , not accelerated.
 
I can't get my head around that just because we can't measure it, we consider it inertial.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Funny that you're replying to a banned clown.

I have a funny feeling that I'm going to be banned pretty soon too.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top