A How is radiation distributed in this experimental setup

MPKU
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
http://imgur.com/a/8B1EV http://imgur.com/a/8B1EV
http://imgur.com/a/8B1EV
As shown, an X-ray tube (source) is striking a fluorescent plate.

The source has a large angle (100+) that the rays are emitted.

How is radiation distributed (spatially and energetically) in this set up? Does this differ from other type of distribution produced by other types of radiation?

My thoughts are that the fluorescent X-rays produced from the plate material are distributed from the site of incident radiation in a spherical distribution.

However some things I am unsure of:

How the rays propagate from the source. Do they bounce of the shield and get directed towards the plate?

Would as much energy be deposited at any location located a distance r away from the point where the rays from the source are incident on the plate? As long as this location is not behind the plate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top