How Is Simple Harmonic motion possible here?

Click For Summary
Amplitude is conserved in simple harmonic motion (SHM) despite varying forces on either side due to the net force being a function of displacement, represented as F=(K1+K2)X. When displaced, the mass experiences a restoring force that is symmetrical, leading to repeated velocity at the equilibrium point. This symmetry in force contributes to the oscillatory nature of SHM, but the consistent speed at equilibrium is primarily due to the conservation of energy. The discussion clarifies that the forces acting on the mass can be effectively modeled as a single spring with an equivalent spring constant. Overall, the principles of energy conservation and symmetrical forces are key to understanding SHM.
Hydrous Caperilla
Messages
62
Reaction score
7
One thing I don't understand is that How Amplitude is conserved on both sides if the mass is subjected to different forces on either side of this shm...
 

Attachments

  • h2krf.jpg
    h2krf.jpg
    9.6 KB · Views: 615
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the net force as a function of displacement?
 
Dale said:
What is the net force as a function of displacement?

If I displace it towards left and then release it ,the net force will be F=(K1+K2)X towards right and then it will reach the equilibrium point and then again experience (K1+K2)X towards left which seems awfully like an even function to me
 
So this is the exact same force as for a mass attached to a single spring with a spring constant k=K1+K2
 
Dale said:
So this is the exact same force as for a mass attached to a single spring with a spring constant k=K1+K2

Kay Makes Sense to Me somewhat...Is that the reason that velocity is also repeated.ie the mean velocity is same after oscillating from mean to left and then coming to mean once again...Can you tell me more about this symmetrical force acting which makes such factors repeat
 
Your period key may need to be removed and cleaned. It appears to be sticking.

The fact that the speed is the same at the equilibrium point is a consequence of the conservation of energy, not the symmetry of the force.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur and Hydrous Caperilla
Kay makes sense to me now.The conservation of enrgy is responsible for that consequence.Thanx for the reply
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
15K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K