How is the Bethe-Bloch formula used in gamma-ray photon detection?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FNL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Detection Photon
FNL
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
can some one give me a link or an article or his argument which Explain how the Bethe-Bloch formula is used to determine the energy of a gamma-ray photon stopped in a spark-chamber detector.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a gamma ray photon will undergo pair production, and it is the total amount of energy from those electrons and positrons that will be collected in an EM-calorimeter.
 
malawi_glenn said:
a gamma ray photon will undergo pair production, and it is the total amount of energy from those electrons and positrons that will be collected in an EM-calorimeter.

yes , it will be clear
thank you
 
malawi_glenn said:
a gamma ray photon will undergo pair production, and it is the total amount of energy from those electrons and positrons that will be collected in an EM-calorimeter.

Is this really what is occurring in such a spark chamber? From what I've understood, all it requires is that the gamma ray causes ionization in the active gas in the spark chamber. Then by looking at the energy loss of these charge ions, one can apply the Bethe-Bloch to deduce the total energy of all the created charge particle and deduce the energy of the gamma photon that cause this ionization in the first place.

In such a low-density gas, one seldom creates pair production.

Zz.
 
Here's a brief article on a spark chamber.
http://eppog.web.cern.ch/eppog/Resources/SparkChamber.html
Another discussion - http://www.ep.ph.bham.ac.uk/index.php?page=general/outreach/SparkChamber/index

Firstly, pair production requires gamma ray energy of at least 1.0221 MeV. PP would be possible in the boundaries and plates/electrodes.

Secondly, I believe Compton scattering is more likely than pair prodcution, and then there is the photo-electric effect.

Is it inferred that the gamma-rays are much greater than 1.0221 MeV?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes ZapperZ, that is correct of you, forgot to read the last word 'spark chamber' properly :)
 
Thanks
 
Back
Top