How is the effective Lagrangian for the Graviton coupling to matter derived?

In summary, many sources discuss the coupling of gravity to matter in the classical weak field approximation, with one example being the book "Quantum Field Theory" by Zee. The coupling can be included by adding the term -∫d4x ½hμνTμν to the action, which can also be expressed as Tμν = (2/√-g) δSM/δgμν or δSM= ½∫d4x √-g Tμν δgμν. This is not circular logic but rather a way to ensure that calculations align with experimental observations. The coupling can also be proven through the deformation of the master equation in the BRST antibracket-
  • #1
Karatechop250
16
1
Could someone point to me where they derive the follow effective Lagrangian for the Graviton coupling to matter

[tex] L = \frac{1}{M_{pl{}}}h^{\mu \nu}T_{\mu \nu}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
A great many books discuss the coupling of gravity to matter in the framework of the classical weak field approximation. One ref that does it QM-ically is Quantum Field Theory by Zee, Sect VIII, "Gravity and Beyond".

The fundamental definition Tμν = - (2/√-g) δSM/δgμν tells us that coupling of the graviton to matter (in the weak field limit) can be included by adding the term - ∫d4x ½hμν Tμν to the action...
 
  • #3
Thanks, however this just seems as circular logic to me and confuses me cause we defined the stress energy tensor that way. I will read this book though.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Since physics is an experimental science, ultimately the answer is "so that our calculations match what we see". This may sound circular, but it's how (and why) science works.
 
  • #5
It's not circular logic, it's just two ways of writing the same thing. Do you want to say T = δS/δg, or do you want to say δS = T δg?

More explicitly, the first form is Tμν = (2/√-g) δSM/δgμν

while the second form is δSM = ½∫d4x √-g Tμν δgμν

They both say that when you subject gμν to an infinitesimal variation, the change in the action is linear in δgμν, and the coefficient is defined to be Tμν.
 
  • #6
You can rigorously prove the Th coupling at first order through deformation of the master equation in the BRST antibracket-antifield formalism: http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.2321v1
 

Related to How is the effective Lagrangian for the Graviton coupling to matter derived?

1. What is Matter Graviton Coupling?

Matter Graviton Coupling is a fundamental concept in physics that describes the interaction between matter particles, such as atoms and molecules, and the gravitational force. It explains how matter is affected by gravity and how it produces gravitational fields.

2. How does Matter Graviton Coupling work?

Matter Graviton Coupling works through the exchange of virtual particles called gravitons. These particles carry the gravitational force between matter particles, causing them to attract each other. The strength of the coupling depends on the mass and distance of the interacting particles.

3. What is the significance of Matter Graviton Coupling?

Matter Graviton Coupling is significant because it is one of the four fundamental forces of nature, along with electromagnetism, strong nuclear force, and weak nuclear force. It plays a crucial role in the structure and behavior of matter on both a microscopic and cosmic scale.

4. How is Matter Graviton Coupling related to Einstein's theory of relativity?

Matter Graviton Coupling is an essential component of Einstein's theory of general relativity, which describes gravity as the curvature of spacetime caused by the presence of matter and energy. The concept of coupling explains how matter particles interact with the curved spacetime, creating the force of gravity.

5. Can Matter Graviton Coupling be observed or measured?

Currently, there is no direct experimental evidence for Matter Graviton Coupling, as gravitons are difficult to detect due to their extremely weak interaction with matter. However, the effects of Matter Graviton Coupling can be observed and measured indirectly through various phenomena, such as the bending of light by massive objects and the gravitational waves detected by advanced instruments.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
640
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
965
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
977
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
857
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
857
Back
Top