I How is the fission of Uranium to Europium possible?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter barnflakes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fission Uranium
barnflakes
Messages
156
Reaction score
4
According to the following website listing the yields of fission products for Uranium and other transuranic isotopes:

https://www-nds.iaea.org/sgnucdat/c3.htm

The fission product 63-Eu-155 is rare but not impossible.

According to my maths, this means there must be another daughter nuclei with atomic number 29 in order to conserve charge etc.

However, Copper (with atomic number 29) is not in the list of fission products, nor any element with an atomic number lower than this.

Therefore, I wonder how the fission of Uranium to Europium is possible?

The only way I can see this becoming possible is for Uranium to split into Europium and to release several alpha particles or protons in the process, but I have not heard of this happening.

Can anyone shed any light on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What about Hydrogen and Helium nuclei? You did say it is rare. Perhaps that's why you don't hear about it.
 
Summing over the fast fission products for 92-U-233, I get 114.5%. For U-235, I get 118.7%. As every fission produces at least two nuclei, I would expect the total sum to add up to roughly 200%. The list doesn't look complete. Another way to see that: It misses many ternary fission products.

Edit: A few isotopes have the same yields, e.g. 42-Mo-99 and 43-Tc-99 or 44-Ru-106 and 45-Rh-106. They are connected via beta decays (including some very long-living nuclides). If I remove these the sum of yields reduces to ~105%.
 
Last edited:
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top