How is torque actually measured when using a torque wrench?

  • Thread starter Thread starter korwynkim
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque Wrench
AI Thread Summary
Torque is calculated using the formula Torque = Fd, where F is the force applied and d is the distance from the pivot point to the point of force application. When using a torque wrench with a crowfoot extension, the angle and length of the extension can affect the torque applied to the nut. Case 1 asserts that if the extension is at 90 degrees to the wrench, the torque remains unchanged, which is correct. Case 3 also holds true as torque should be measured perpendicularly from the handle to the nut, but is less practical in tight spaces. Case 2 is incorrect because it misrepresents the relationship between the force and pivot point.
korwynkim
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
wqoF5KW.png

Take this picture for example. Assume this picture represents a torque wrench applying torque on a nut, and a force F is applied at the centre of the black handle perpendicular to it. The force applied to the nut is:

Torque = Fd

There are times when a nut is in a very inconvenient location and you can't fit a torque wrench on it. Sometimes, a crow foot extension will be able to reach it. The problem is, changing the lever arm changes the torque.

Case 1: The common knowledge is that if the extension is at 90 degrees to the torque wrench, the torque applied to the nut doesn't change.

Torque = Fd (regardless of x)
vIkcW7g.png


Case 2: I have also heard that in order for the torque to remain the same, the distance from the handle of the wrench to the nut should be kept the same as the distance from the handle to the pivot point.

Torque = Fy = Fd
D3nTfxw.png


Case 3: Distance for torque should be measured from the handle to the nut perpendicular to the force applied.

Torque = Fx
P3F38G1.png


What is the correct method to measure torque applied to the nut?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Case 1 is correct. Case 3 is also correct, but is obviously less mechanically advantageous, unless it gets you round an awkward obstacle.
Case 2 is not correct. For this to work, the force would have to be perpendicular to y.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top