How long does it take this transverse wave to travel along a string

AI Thread Summary
To determine the time it takes for a transverse wave to travel along a combined string of length 3L under tension F, the wave speed must be calculated for each segment of the string, which has varying mass per unit length. The formula for wave speed is V = √(Tension/Linear Mass Density). The average speed across the three segments cannot be simply averaged due to differing densities; instead, the time for the wave to traverse each section must be calculated separately and then summed. The initial attempt at averaging the speeds was incorrect, prompting a reevaluation of the approach. The correct method involves finding the individual travel times for each section and adding them together for the total time.
jcadams9
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If the combined string is under tension F, how much time does it take a transverse wave to travel the entire length 3L? Give your answer in terms of L, F, and mu_1.

Three pieces of string, each of length L, are joined together end-to-end, to make a combined string of length 3L. The first piece of string has mass per unit length mu_1, the second piece has mass per unit length 4mu _1, and the third piece has mass per unit length (1/4)mu_1

Homework Equations



V= (Sqrt (Tension/Linear Mass Density)

V/L=T

The Attempt at a Solution



Well it seems like I could find the speed of the wave over each section of the string, average all three to get the average velocity and simply divide by the total length of the string 3L like so but this is giving me an incorrect answer.

((Sqrt(F/mu_1) + Sqrt(4F/mu_1) +Sqrt(F/4mu_1)) /3) / (3*L)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try finding the time for the wave to travel through each string and add all three up.

Is the answer different?
 
Actually it is different - I'll give that a try thanks =)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top