How long was the mallet in contact with the ball?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tony873004
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Significant figures
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time a mallet was in contact with a croquet ball, given its mass and the force applied. The calculations show that the mallet was in contact with the ball for approximately 5.53 milliseconds. There is a debate about significant figures, with some arguing that the answer should be rounded to 0.0 seconds due to the precision of the initial speed measurement. Additionally, the impulse-momentum theorem is suggested as a more elegant method for solving the problem, highlighting its mathematical equivalence to the force approach. The conversation emphasizes the importance of significant figures in physics calculations and the evolving understanding of problem-solving methods.
tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143
11. [Walker2 9.P.010.] A 0.50 kg croquet ball is initially at rest on the grass. When the ball is struck by a mallet, the average force exerted on it is 235 N. If the ball's speed after being struck is 2.6 m/s, how long was the mallet in contact with the ball? (in miliseconds)

F = ma
235 = 0.50 * a
a = 235 / 0.5
a = 470
v = at
2.6 = 470 t
t = 2.6 / 470
t = 0.00553191489361702 s
t = 5.53 ms

I got this correct according to the online grading system, but if they were picky about significant figures wouldn't I have done?:

t = 0.00553191489361702 s
2.6 is the value with the least amount of significant digits with 2, therefore
t = 0.0 s
t = 0 ms
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, those placeholder zeros in front of the 5 are not significant.

Also, I think using the impulse-momentum theorem is a better (albeit mathematically equivalent) way to think of the problem:

F_{\rm avg}t = \Delta mv
t = m\frac{v-v_o}{F_{\rm avg}}
 
jamesrc said:
No, those placeholder zeros in front of the 5 are not significant.

Also, I think using the impulse-momentum theorem is a better (albeit mathematically equivalent) way to think of the problem:

F_{\rm avg}t = \Delta mv
t = m\frac{v-v_o}{F_{\rm avg}}

Thanks, that makes sense. We spent the first week of class on significant figures, and now he doesn't enforce it so we all got lazy.

Thanks for the impulse formulas. I did this problem before I read the impulse chapter by using the force formulas, but your way looks more elegant. :-p
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top